(http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z295/rohlfo/DSfinal.png) | (http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z295/rohlfo/DSfinalup.png) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
(http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z295/rohlfo/Vitalisfinal.png) | (http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z295/rohlfo/vitalisfinalup.png) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
too OP, aether/life deck with fractal or mitosis. oh and i swear this has been done beforeOP? Dimensionless Spirit is immaterial, and Vitalis is quite pricey to be fractaling/mitosising....? At least not any worse than other creatures already in the game.
oops i didnt see that immaterial... well :Ltoo OP, aether/life deck with fractal or mitosis. oh and i swear this has been done beforeOP? Dimensionless Spirit is immaterial, and Vitalis is quite pricey to be fractaling/mitosising....? At least not any worse than other creatures already in the game.
As to done before - are you thinking of this (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22528.0.html) thread?
No worries :)oops i didnt see that immaterial... well :Ltoo OP, aether/life deck with fractal or mitosis. oh and i swear this has been done beforeOP? Dimensionless Spirit is immaterial, and Vitalis is quite pricey to be fractaling/mitosising....? At least not any worse than other creatures already in the game.
As to done before - are you thinking of this (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22528.0.html) thread?
and that thread i dont think thats the one but i cant remember so it might have been it ::)
CURATOR COMMENTdone.
-Fix the title of the thread so that it just only includes the Name | Name of the card - i.e. remove the entire part in Parenthesis
-Remove the period after the word, 'Immaterial', in the TEXT section of your tables
-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)which artwork? the one from Emerald Tiger or from freedigitalphotos?
freedigitalphotos. The current link directs us to an album or something, we cannot determine the photo used and whether or not you're following its license.-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)which artwork? the one from Emerald Tiger or from freedigitalphotos?
I use this website a lot, and it says to use an image you must give credit and provide a link to their portfolio, which I have done. I think it was even Kuro who pointed this out a few months back when I was only providing a link to the picture, and not their portfolio (which their website says I must as far as I can remember!)freedigitalphotos. The current link directs us to an album or something, we cannot determine the photo used and whether or not you're following its license.-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)which artwork? the one from Emerald Tiger or from freedigitalphotos?
oh, kk.I use this website a lot, and it says to use an image you must give credit and provide a link to their portfolio, which I have done. I think it was even Kuro who pointed this out a few months back when I was only providing a link to the picture, and not their portfolio (which their website says I must as far as I can remember!)freedigitalphotos. The current link directs us to an album or something, we cannot determine the photo used and whether or not you're following its license.-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)which artwork? the one from Emerald Tiger or from freedigitalphotos?
That is why I asked which picture he meant.
oh, also other cards of mine already in the crucible also only have the required portfolio link, another reason why I thought I'd double check which picture he meant.
http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/images/Multicolored_g336-Fires_p21508.htmlthat is exactly the picture I used (as you can see, edited it a bit to get what I wanted).
I think this the closest to what you used that i could find.
[url=http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/images/view_photog.php?photogid=659]Image: Salvatore Vuono / FreeDigitalPhotos.net[/url]
ART CURATOR BABBLE:done
Please use the following attribution format:Code: [Select][url=http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/images/view_photog.php?photogid=659]Image: Salvatore Vuono / FreeDigitalPhotos.net[/url]
I think this would be a great card. SoR would add to its effectiveness, but one Ball Lightning per round wouldn't be OP. Good stuff! (+Karma)Thanks ;D
It is immaterial, so you can't use SoR on it.I think this would be a great card. SoR would add to its effectiveness, but one Ball Lightning per round wouldn't be OP. Good stuff! (+Karma)Thanks ;D
It is immaterial, so you can't use SoR on it.Ack, didn't notice that. Still a great card.