Dimensionless Spirit | Dimensionless Spirit

[rohlfo]

NAME: Dimensionless Spirit ELEMENT: Aether COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 1|1 TEXT: Immaterial   : breath of life Turn Dimensionless Spirit into a Vitalis.	NAME: Dimensionless Spirit ELEMENT: Aether COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 1|1 TEXT: Immaterial   : breath of life Turn Dimensionless Spirit into an Elite Vitalis.

ART: EmeraldTiger provided for in this thread: http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22528.0.html IDEA: rohlfo NOTES: not quite in our dimension, so weak, but immaterial Aether doesn't have a small creature (with HP>0) so fills that gap in game But can also evolve into a largish hitter for life (also possible gap in game) SERIES:

And the creature it evolves into:

NAME: Vitalis ELEMENT: Life COST: 6 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 5|4 TEXT: : summon a Spark.	NAME: Elite Vitalis ELEMENT: Life COST: 6 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 5|4 TEXT: : summon a Ball Lightning.

ART: rohlfo, using art from Dimensionless Spirit provided by Emerald Tiger Image: Salvatore Vuono / FreeDigitalPhotos.net (http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/images/view_photog.php?photogid=659) Direct link to image: http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/images/Multicolored_g336-Fires_p21508.html IDEA: rohlfo NOTES: idea is it's so full of life that it lets off static charges which show it's aether origins good mid/high range hitter for life with added bonus can summon once a turn currently not a stand alone card, but can be if enough people want SERIES:

feedback etc welcome

[DeathPanda1]

too OP, aether/life deck with fractal or mitosis. oh and i swear this has been done before

[rohlfo]

too OP, aether/life deck with fractal or mitosis. oh and i swear this has been done before

OP? Dimensionless Spirit is immaterial, and Vitalis is quite pricey to be fractaling/mitosising....? At least not any worse than other creatures already in the game.

As to done before - are you thinking of this (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22528.0.html) thread?

[DeathPanda1]

too OP, aether/life deck with fractal or mitosis. oh and i swear this has been done before

OP? Dimensionless Spirit is immaterial, and Vitalis is quite pricey to be fractaling/mitosising....? At least not any worse than other creatures already in the game.

As to done before - are you thinking of this (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22528.0.html) thread?

oops i didnt see that immaterial... well :L
and that thread i dont think thats the one but i cant remember so it might have been it 

[rohlfo]

too OP, aether/life deck with fractal or mitosis. oh and i swear this has been done before

OP? Dimensionless Spirit is immaterial, and Vitalis is quite pricey to be fractaling/mitosising....? At least not any worse than other creatures already in the game.

As to done before - are you thinking of this (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22528.0.html) thread?

oops i didnt see that immaterial... well :L
and that thread i dont think thats the one but i cant remember so it might have been it 

No worries
might have been the original post in the Aether/Life - Life/Aether challange (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,21305.0.html)?

[rohlfo]

bump for feedback before I submit

[Kuroaitou]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Fix the title of the thread so that it just only includes the Name | Name of the card - i.e. remove the entire part in Parenthesis
-Remove the period after the word, 'Immaterial', in the TEXT section of your tables
-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)

[rohlfo]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Fix the title of the thread so that it just only includes the Name | Name of the card - i.e. remove the entire part in Parenthesis

done.

-Remove the period after the word, 'Immaterial', in the TEXT section of your tables

not quite sure what you mean? - ah, thought it might be that, we call it a full stop this side of the pond, hence me not getting what you meant!

-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)

which artwork? the one from Emerald Tiger or from freedigitalphotos?

[Pineapple]

-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)

which artwork? the one from Emerald Tiger or from freedigitalphotos?

freedigitalphotos. The current link directs us to an album or something, we cannot determine the photo used and whether or not you're following its license.

[rohlfo]

-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)

which artwork? the one from Emerald Tiger or from freedigitalphotos?

freedigitalphotos. The current link directs us to an album or something, we cannot determine the photo used and whether or not you're following its license.

I use this website a lot, and it says to use an image you must give credit and provide a link to their portfolio, which I have done. I think it was even Kuro who pointed this out a few months back when I was only providing a link to the picture, and not their portfolio (which their website says I must as far as I can remember!)
That is why I asked which picture he meant.
oh, also other cards of mine already in the crucible also only have the required portfolio link, another reason why I thought I'd double check which picture he meant.

[EmeraldTiger]

http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/images/Multicolored_g336-Fires_p21508.html
I think this the closest to what you used that i could find.

[Pineapple]

-*Try to also provide a link to the actual page where you found the artwork (so that Curators can see where the art source is directly located)

which artwork? the one from Emerald Tiger or from freedigitalphotos?

freedigitalphotos. The current link directs us to an album or something, we cannot determine the photo used and whether or not you're following its license.

I use this website a lot, and it says to use an image you must give credit and provide a link to their portfolio, which I have done. I think it was even Kuro who pointed this out a few months back when I was only providing a link to the picture, and not their portfolio (which their website says I must as far as I can remember!)
That is why I asked which picture he meant.
oh, also other cards of mine already in the crucible also only have the required portfolio link, another reason why I thought I'd double check which picture he meant.

oh, kk.