Corruption | Conversion

[killsdazombies]

Thats because its not OP or UP its not broken or a noob card, its a good card which would be a nice addition along with other that drain all of its element, under certain things yes its powerful, but its not overly powerful... /10 *yes i am copying glitch a bit* In other words i like this card the way it currently is

[dragonhuman]

did anyone pay attention to my suggestion of having the creature stuck in a time bubble for 1 turn once stolen? it'd give a chance to have the opponent attempt to do something

as per cost of creature + set amount of darkness sounds like a good idea, and then it would still drain users darkness quantums?

[Bloodshadow]

as per cost of creature + set amount of darkness sounds like a good idea, and then it would still drain users darkness quantums?

I don't think that's possible to program. The cost of a card must be a constant.

[Kael Hate]

Unless Kael tells me it's OP, I'm not listening to anyone's arguments or suggestions. Not saying they're bad, but Kael is the one who's actually testing the card in simulated games; his judgement is often more accurate because he's actually USING the card, instead of just guessing.

So yes you are allowed to use it for projects and even change it but all the licencing and permission of terms from the original creator have to go with it.

So I should just post a link to the license page? Thanks. Done.

To all others who suggested things like variable cost for this card, not being able to target weapons/nymphs: I would want to avoid making this card too complicated. Right now Kael is testing this card, and he's not saying it's OP yet.

Lol, Ultimate Authority thing is funny.

I think it is quite strong at this stage for the current environment but not overpowered.

The strength is from the card advantage, not cost etc. An offset needs to occur if this is to be brought back to even level. In a perfectly adaptable environment I would add the cost of sacrificing a creature, but the current engine cannot handle sequential targets. Other options could be to reduce the creatures power to 0 so there is no offensive gain by default or to give the opponent something such as 10-25 life.

[BluePriest]

I like it. Its a real good idea, but I think the only way to really make sure it stays at a good power, is having an attack or defense limit that you can not exceed for taking the opponents monster. Or perhaps double the cost of the spell when it is converted. Aka devour would cost 2,  Scarab 4 ect.

[Bloodshadow]

The image is updated. This card now uses an edited stock photo, provided by SG. I've decided to make this an entry for the Epic 3 Cards Challenge.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6012.0.html

[xdude]

The image is updated. This card now uses an edited stock photo, provided by SG. I've decided to make this an entry for the Epic 3 Cards Challenge.

http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,6012.0.html

So, now you're not listening to KH either?

[Bloodshadow]

What?

The new photo is something Zanz can actually use.

[xdude]

What?

The new photo is something Zanz can actually use.

Unless Kael tells me it's OP, I'm not listening to anyone's arguments or suggestions. Not saying they're bad, but Kael is the one who's actually testing the card in simulated games; his judgement is often more accurate because he's actually USING the card, instead of just guessing.

So yes you are allowed to use it for projects and even change it but all the licencing and permission of terms from the original creator have to go with it.

So I should just post a link to the license page? Thanks. Done.

To all others who suggested things like variable cost for this card, not being able to target weapons/nymphs: I would want to avoid making this card too complicated. Right now Kael is testing this card, and he's not saying it's OP yet.

Lol, Ultimate Authority thing is funny.

I think it is quite strong at this stage for the current environment but not overpowered.

The strength is from the card advantage, not cost etc. An offset needs to occur if this is to be brought back to even level. In a perfectly adaptable environment I would add the cost of sacrificing a creature, but the current engine cannot handle sequential targets. Other options could be to reduce the creatures power to 0 so there is no offensive gain by default or to give the opponent something such as 10-25 life.

[Avenger]

If a deck breaks on a single stolen creature, it is really a crappy weak deck.
So, i guess, conversion is ok with the miracle cost (12/10 + drain all).
The only thing i hate is the converted skill usage.
I have 3 optional suggestions:
1. poison the stolen creature, it will die and be gone + convert skill
2. strip the skill, but keep the creature
3. poison, keep the skill as original quanta, but give the creature back to the owner's hand after it died from poison

Maybe 3 is a bit too complicated.

[BluePriest]

Most of the new FGs are weak. Why? Because most of them rely on creature control, and almost every Anti FG deck, is also Anti creature control. When it comes down to it, I ultimately think in a FG deck Permamnent crontrol is more deadly than Creature control. My point? Its easy to protect your creatures. The card really isnt OP because of this. The decks that dont protect thier creatures, usually spam them like crazy, so losing just 1 monster wont matter.

[assassim]

Why is this card in the Crucible?