Corrodation | Massive corrosion

[Zergva]

NAME: Corrodation ELEMENT: Time COST: 2 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Corrosion: reduce the effects of target shield or weapon (except Other). Draw a card.	NAME: Massive corrosion ELEMENT: Time COST: 1 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Corrosion: reduce the effects of target shield or weapon (except Other). Draw a card.

ART: http://wanderlust-or-bust.deviantart.com/art/Corrosive-Beauty-245554449 IDEA: Theraxin NOTES: Dissipation unupped: 1  for 1 dmg Dissipation upped: 2  for 1 Bone wall: 1 shield for triggered death Skull buckler: triggered death chance is halved. Gravity shield: "more than 7 HP" Titanium|adamantium shield: reduced by 1. Thorn Carapace: 37% Emerald shield: useless Fire shield: 50% of dealing 1 dmg. Ice shield: half the chance of freezing. Solar shield: Every second attack gains. Relfective shield: useless Hope: useless Wings: halven the turns left. Fog shield: 20% Dusk mantle: 25% Dim shield: Sets the counter to 0. Weapons get halved damage. 2 Corrodation destroys the shield|weapon.   SERIES:

[jawdirk]

I like this idea. I might change the wording to something less descriptive like "Corrosion: reduce the effects of target shield or weapon. Draw a card."

[skyironsword]

Okaaaay... ... ...

This is very good on some shields and nearly useless on others.

<- 1 for 1 ratio. Unless you're about to make it 1 for 0...?

[Zergva]

Okaaaay... ... ...

This is very good on some shields and nearly useless on others.

<- 1 for 1 ratio. Unless you're about to make it 1 for 0...?

2 for 1

And I've tried it to be useful on the stronger shields.

[skyironsword]

2 for 1, vs. 1 for 1 is twice as weak.

1 for 3, vs. 1 for 2 is only 2/3 as weak.

Balancing needed.

[Zergva]

I like this idea. I might change the wording to something less descriptive like "Corrosion: reduce the effects of target shield or weapon. Draw a card."

Wording changed

[Zergva]

2 for 1, vs. 1 for 1 is twice as weak.

1 for 3, vs. 1 for 2 is only 2/3 as weak.

Balancing needed.

I don't wanted it to be fair, I wanted to hurt better shields more.

[Zergva]

Notes changed

[Zergva]

How about now, with a nearly equivalent draining?

[serprex]

Titanium/Diamond Shield should say "by 1" rather than "to 1" as Diamond Shield should only be reduced to DR2
Besides immaterial shields, this seems least effective against Bone Wall, which is good since a strength of Bone Wall is PC resillience. If you wanted to be harsh you'd halve the stacks. What happens if you use Corrodation twice on Bone Wall?

On Dim Shield: Can this destroy it? May be better if it sets counter to 0

Should be renamed to Corrosion | Corrosion

[jawdirk]

Titanium/Diamond Shield should say "by 1" rather than "to 1" as Diamond Shield should only be reduced to DR2

On Dim Shield: May be better if it sets counter to 0

I agree with these.

Should be renamed to Corrosion | Corrosion

Or Corrode | Corrode

Otherwise, I like it!

[Zergva]

Does this card ready for Crucible?