Hm... Even though I'm still against the idea of creatures named after the Zodiac, this creature could be something that's implemented by Zanz (
as a different element/name, possibly). I take back the strikethrough part; time needs better creature control.
Does your card have 'Ranged' as the passive? If so, you probably shouldn't have to put that in the table (Both the Airbourne and Ranged passives aren't on any cards yet). Also, your card NEEDS to have the word, 'Sniper' in the description text box, because otherwise the player doesn't know what exactly the two
quanta is used for.
Instead of:
"Snipe
Deal 3 damages to the target creature, ranged"
Try:
"
: Sniper
Deals 3 damage to the
target creature."
...in the ability text box, and change your ability description to match the above. It looks a lot more elegant this way. Also, get rid of the (rare) part after the creature - just mention that in your notes.
| |
NAME: | Sagittarius | ELEMENT: | Time | COST: | 5 | TYPE: | Creature | ATK|HP: | 3|7 | ABILITY: | : Sniper Deals 3 damage to the target creature |
| NAME: | Sagittarius | ELEMENT: | Time | COST: | 6 | TYPE: | Creature | ATK|HP: | 3|8 | ABILITY: | : Sniper Deals 3 damage to the target creature |
|