Voting: The New False God

[Glitch]

Also, this petty bickering is getting a bit much.

I apologize my good man.  The whole thing is beginning to remind me of the Bull Moose party anyway.

[fung]

Hi all,
 I am new here and I found this game very fun, but hard..

All those gods looks very fun to play against

I wish I am good enough to challenge any god yet...

[Antagon]

EDIT: I gave your deck a fair shake and played it against the halfbloods.  It won 1 game out of 10.

enough said, i think you just exspect a different deck (more control in the long run) then deck is, but playing against halfbloods is just senseless, cause you NEED the triple mark (also the double draw) and the discord-advantage destroyed by an opposite triple mark isnt good too. THATS the reason, why cards like maxwell and more bes are more than enough, and DreamCatcher only have 6 in the deck caused by double-draw and the amount of pillars (you dont need that many, and the "few" are more than enough, you also have a good chance to have one pillar in the starting hand, and with double draw youll get others soon. and i know gravity force is nice, but in my opinion the ai plays it only efficient when it is the only creature-removal card in the deck, otherwise there are often played first followed by another destructive card, so its a waste (short time ago ai played all gfs at once, which is changed, thanks god).

and you dont need the discord so fast (it isnt based on it to win), and i think thats the main thought of this deck, you dont need any card or combo to win, but there are lots of combos which work fine together and you have always a quick start with a lot of pressure.

thats also the reason i didnt understand the match between decks, cause the idea isnt the same, they work completely different.

[ODSTRookie]

I look at it again and it does kindve looks like a shard farm. However, this is a shard farm that will protect its crops. I mean all that healing combined with enchanted permafrosts and flooding for severley limiting the amount of creatures you could play while simuytlatenously beating you down with dr4agons. As if blits and seisms enchanted shields were annoying enough.

[cthulhu]

Why are these polls always so painfully predictable?

[Glitch]

Why are these polls always so painfully predictable?

I always find them to be just the opposite.

[Thalas]

Why no one vote for my fenrir. there are 4 elements in one deck. THE NEW QUATRO DECK!!!!

[cthulhu]

Why are these polls always so painfully predictable?

I always find them to be just the opposite.

Then perhaps you should stop listening to yourself? 

[Andrek]

I think that MirrorMirror would be fun to play against. You vs your own deck, except it has cards to increase it's creature power and decrease yours.

[Seravy]

I voted Rayp, Boreas, Nosferatu.

All three are good, solid decks with weaknesses you can take advantage of using existing god killing decks.

A majority of the others would be so overpowered with the extra draw and marks I don't even want to think about playing against them, you should beat new gods with the existing decks at least 50-60% of the time, not even more auto-losses, we have enough of those already.
Gods that can only be beaten by a specific strategy are not good, as you don't know which one you'll fight against, and obviously that specific deck will be weak/useless against the others.
Any new god that kills a fractal/ray god killer deck are not good because that's the ONLY non-rainbow god killer at the moment with a good win rate, and everyone is already sick of playing rainbow all the time.
(And I don't see new god killer decks to surface any time soon unless they get nerfed)

On a side note...if gods would get nerfed, most of these decks would be awesome...but with the current advantage for gods, they'd be near unbeatable instead.

[Terroking]

I'm surprised Neptune has this many votes, the deck loses completely if the shield is stolen, it nulls the squids and makes they crawlers deal only 4 damage, while they're not frozen. Someone using Puppy's deck will also have their own permafrost, making it even more likely to come out. Since the crawlers are the only offense, and each one is almost nulled by a shard, it makes it fairly easy for the player to stall for a quinted oty, and then the game is over.

Tauros can have a ton of scarabs out by then, along with burrowed shriekers to seal in the win (They can be stopped by shards too, but they're not the only offense).

[Astaroth]

I'm surprised Neptune has this many votes, the deck loses completely if the shield is stolen, it nulls the squids and makes they crawlers deal only 4 damage, while they're not frozen. Someone using Puppy's deck will also have their own permafrost, making it even more likely to come out. Since the crawlers are the only offense, and each one is almost nulled by a shard, it makes it fairly easy for the player to stall for a quinted oty, and then the game is over.

There are numerous entries with that problem, yet they've gotten plenty of votes.