I must complain about this
"The most reliable 'RPS decks' will be chosen by the public and used in a pvp tournament."
I didn't see the "most reliable" part, as I read something of using it in a tourney, I said: "Who would want a RPS tourney with 100% chances of winning to one of them, we're Elements community, we like playing decks and trying to win even vs an 'anti-your deck' deck", so I tried to make a non-boring neither monotonous deck in order to make the RPS something different than a regular RPS tourney...
If 100% RPS was the objective, running a RPS game where you PM the organizer with your choice would be the same.
I guess, by the comments made in the original thread, that that wasn't the original idea, but it was to make 3 "real life" (serious?) decks to be used in a tourney that countered each other...
Well, what it's done, it's done, but I wanted to point that out