The Biggest Loser

[xuru]

losing tournament
change a main rule of matches, you are not going to win first, u are going to lose
so you have to kill yourself as fast as you can :}

It could be very funny

my post from tournaments ideas ; )

IMO tournament or pvp event would be better and more interesting. It's like a grinding competition 

[kev]

That's simple, the winner is chosen by a vote.

Tbh the award should just go to the most losses.  I strongly suspect the most losses will also have 0 wins.  But we have to acknowledge a scenario where player A gets more votes than player B despite B having more losses.

If player A has an ingenious deck and went 0-100, he should still lose to player B who's deck is poorly constructed but went 3-150.  And it's not even close.

Please let us know the exact rules ASAP.  I've been grinding but I'm going to stop if there's a chance I'll be the clear victor and lose to a popular vote.

[Nume]

That's simple, the winner is chosen by a vote.

The hard part of that is that it would likely just turn into a popularity contest. The only way for it to be fair really is if people sent you their decks and stats, and you posted them all onto a thread with a poll, without saying which belong to who.

[karis]

um...   i'm don't good in english at all, can you explain your reply again?

you say it use three thing to determine the winner, the number of loses, how fast your deck loses, and the deck itself.

but in the end, you say the winner is count by vote?

i'm mean, am i really must  post a screenshot or something like that,   only a deck is not enough?

[suxerz]

so, here it is...
total so far = 0 win / 203 losses

after almost 5 hours, i feel kinda dumb...   -.-

i started to feel that this is useless...

though not much today but i think i've accomplished something else!
total time taken: 61 seconds!

time on the clock - 6:40:46 am


time on the clock - 6:41:47 am
total time taken: 72 seconds!

time on the clock - 6:26:12 am


time on the clock - 6:27:24 am

Code: [Select]

4vj 4vj 4vj 5fb 5fb 5fb 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u2 6u3 6u3 6u3 7an 7an 7an 7h0 7jv 7jv 7jv 7jv 7qb 7qb 7qb 7qb 7qb 80a 80aa sample of 10 games with this deck:
game1:   88 sec
game2:   77 sec
game3:   68 sec
game4:   80 sec
game5:   94 sec
game6:   71 sec
game7:   75 sec
game8:   90 sec
game9:   80 sec
game10:   105 sec
average (time to loose): 82.8 sec


although i'm not totally agree with the vote system, but i'm bored now so might as well join this.
edit1:glad that that there is no vote now added my 1st day try
edit2: added day 2
edit2: added day 3
edit3: added deck & fastest game

[Purity_Riot]

All contests are decided by votes. I trust everyone to be mature enough to vote properly. I have finished editing the rules, they have no need to change. People will be judged based off of number of loses, how quickly their deck loses, and deck design. People should take all these things into consideration when voting.

[the dictator]

No, not all competitions are decided by votes.

The one you can compare this one best with is: Empowered creatures (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,7246.0.html), and Undefeated (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,7249.0.html).

And at those there has never been a voting.


Also, my question still stands: is the trainer allowed to be able to make upgraded decks?

[Purity_Riot]

Seems I'm mistaken. Looks like I'll be judging it myself then based off of number of loses, deck, and speed of loss. Speed of the loss being most important, followed by number of loses, and finally deck.

And I already addressed the trainer question. Yes it can be used, just post them all individually at the end.

[suxerz]

can i just put the top part for win/loss ratio like this below?


and is this acceptable screen shot (below) for beginning/end shortest game? i can't seem to get a quality shot for both the game and the clock? i'm running on resolution 1920x1080 if that means anything. any suggestion?

[Purity_Riot]

As long as we can see the clock, that's fine.

Both seem alright to me.

[suxerz]

As long as we can see the clock, that's fine.

Both seem alright to me.

ok, thanks. i'll add the win/loss ratio for today in my earlier post.

[twinsbuster]

It is no point to compare the number of lose games.

I'm quite sure we can always lose the game 100% if we want to.
Just simply make a deck with 30 pillars can do it easily.
so I agree this competition is no point at all.

It is a good idea for tournament only as players can compete the self-killing speed and heal opponent.