Competition: Best Weapon Idea

[slovenc555]

@slovenc: how much damage does the ability deal, to be exact?

2N, where the N is the number of creatures your opponent owns. so, if your opponent has a full board (23), damage dealt is 46! Acctually the upper limit is 8, but dealt to creatures is 2 to each with total limit of... well... infinity!

btw: flying/animated: N/5

[Astaroth]

Ok. Here's my entry.

(http://www.screenshotdumpster.com/) (http://www.screenshotdumpster.com/)

Before people scream "OMG That upgraded card is SOOO OP," there could be different percentages for the creatures. Lower percentages would obviously be given to the dragon. If left at every darkness creature having an equal chance to be generated, it still wouldn't be that bad in my opinion. That's a 25% chance of getting a dragon, 25% of getting a vampire, and 50% for the other two stupid darkness creatures.

Discuss. Vote. What-have-you.

[slovenc555]

@Astaroth

BOTH are overpowered.

[Astaroth]

@Astaroth

BOTH are overpowered.

Yeah, well you spelled "dealt" wrong in your card. 

[slovenc555]

did I?

[Astaroth]

did I?

Unless you meant the possible plural for "deltoid," a large triangular muscle that covers the shoulder joint and serves to raise the arm laterally, I would say you spelled it wrong. 

[Demagog]

Your wording is also wrong elsewhere. If a creature loses -1/-1, it should actually gain 1/1. Instead it should say the creature gains -1/-1 or loses 1/1. A double negative is always a positive.

[ScytherLoL]

Ok so here we go with a card inspired by an old friend of mine...

Dacra/Greater Dacra


link Card Ideas: http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,3853.new.html#new

Thanks

Scyther

[ScytherLoL]

Like what my card says basically Demagog..

Thanks

Scyther

[Astaroth]

Your wording is also wrong elsewhere. If a creature loses -1/-1, it should actually gain 1/1. Instead it should say the creature gains -1/-1 or loses 1/1. A double negative is always a positive.

I thought about that when making the card, but "gains [negative number]" just sounds stupid to me. There is not a card with this type of wording yet, so I want to see how Zanz puts it.

Plus, I kind of worded it like that so voters wouldn't get confused. I can see people saying "How would it die if it's gaining stats?" if I put it those other two ways.

[ScytherLoL]

Ok just let me wade in here with one comment.

In the history of CCG there have been many cards with Attack and Hp these are portrayed by 3|2 or such.

In every other game it is said you get or gain +1|+1 or -1|-1 it does not state loses as that is more confusing to people.

ie. (mtg)  Afflict, Instant, Target Creature gets -1|-1 til end of turn.

Just so we can tidy this up and fit within what everyone else is doing is what Demagog is getting at.

Thanks

Scyther

[Scaredgirl]

Wow.. first time I see this thread and already it's full of very cool ideas.

I love that Boomerang idea, although it might be a bit overpowered as it looks to be the ultimate deck-out prevention tool. Very cool idea though.

I think Bloodshadow's card breaks the rule #1 and maybe #7. It generates a "Shade", a creature that does not exist in Elements, therefore basically combining two different ideas. It's unfair if one contestant can use this kind of method to get more depth into his/her idea.