Competition: A Challenge of Challenges

[JonathanCrazyJ]

A Challenge of Challenges

"I, The Challenge Master, challenge you to create a challenge for other challengers, Challenger."
"The challenges you challenge Challengers with are challenging, Mr Challenge Master."
"The Challenger's Challenge must also be Challenging, I challenge you to challenge a challenging challenge to Challengers!"
"Challenge Accepted."

The Challenge

• You will design a 'Challenge' using Elements the Game.
• Examples of challenges are 'The (Nearly) No Bazaar Challenge' by ColorlessGreen, 'The Gauntlet' by ddevans96, and 'The Oracle Challenge' by dawn to dusk.
• Your Challenge may involve the trainer or the real game.
• Your Submission should be formatted as if you were posting the finished Challenge. You may want to try to make it look good.
• If you like, you may include screenshots, play-through results, or other information in a spoiler beneath your submission. This is not mandatory.
• Your Challenge should be FUN! Remember, you want for people to want to play against your challenge, so make it tough, but beatable and interesting to play. Nobody will play "Defeat 10 False Gods in a row with an unupgraded Mono."
• Post your submission in this thread.

The Challenge has begun! You have not a second

[rogerluc]

to grow up the number of arena player and people in chat ( don"t know if it will be work )  , i suggest to beat an arena deck of which the creator deck is connected to the chat.
Just take screen of the victory and another of the chat where we can see the time.
Enjoy and don"t forget to be crazy !

[ddevans96]

Halfway through the submission phase now, please get your challenges in!

[foxrain4]

I challenge you to stop playing elements or any other games and get a life.

[Flayne]

I challenge you to stop playing elements or any other games and get a life.

Funny thing about this, is that most likely people would find it easier to "Defeat 10 False Gods in a row with an unupgraded mono",
I mean in comparison to Fox's challenge,
Jon's example of a bad and invalid submission actually seems a decent and valid one lol

Tl;dr: Foxrain's submission is invalid due to not meeting the following criteria:

Make it tough, but beatable

[iDaire]

Use any unupped version of a false god deck and using only three interchangeable cards, defeat it's corresponding false god.

[andretimpa]

@Flayne

'Should' is not the same as 'must'. No one is stopping you from submitting "Defeat 10 False Gods in a row with an unupgraded mono".

The challenge I'm thinking on submit is endless for example. The goal is to get as far as you can, there's no way to "beat it".

[Treldon]

Fox's challenge is beatable, but nobody sane would accept such a challenge (or stay sane for a long time after  )

[Flayne]

'Should' is not the same as 'must'. No one is stopping you from submitting "Defeat 10 False Gods in a row with an unupgraded mono".

I am fully aware of this despite the "joke" post I made. But on that note, Since John already posted that as a bad challenge idea, anyone can see that posting that same idea would be unoriginal and absurd despite it being technically valid.

The challenge I'm thinking on submit is endless for example. The goal is to get as far as you can, there's no way to "beat it".

what you are thinking of submitting resembles an
arcade game that specifically isn't beatable but instead is an endless and continuous cycle of gameplay and thereby considers a point system (represented by how far you've gotten) as its most important indicator of progress, the challenge of attaining a high-score.

However, since it is not beatable, Unless Jonathan changes his criteria ( "Beatable") then I would assume that technically this submission is invalid.
But obviously Jonathan would be the one to decide.

[Submachine]

Can the challenge be a part of a bigger, almost off-topic forum project or does it have to be standalone?

[JonathanCrazyJ]

An endless challenge is allowed.
My definition of 'beatable' allows this. If it has no ending, it is beaten merely in its playing.
Also, 'beatable' is part of a "Should" line, not a "Must" line.

It is hard for me to answer Sub's question because I would need to see the submission. I am almost certain it is allowed

Fox's challenge is disallowed. It must involve the Trainer or the real game. This specifically involves not using either.
EDIT: Poor wording in the OP makes his submission technically legal.

[JonathanCrazyJ]

The Ring Run

Can you run rings around the Arena?

• RNG 2 Elements.
• Build a deck using at least 4 non-Pillar/Pendulum cards from those elements. 'Other' Cards are allowed. Any amount of any other elements are also allowed.
• Win 4 Bronze Arena Matches.
• Then Win 3 Silver Arena Matches.
• Then Win 2 Gold Arena Matches.
• Then Win 1 Platinum Arena Matches.
• Then Win one more game of Bronze, then Silver, then Gold, then Platinum.
• Enjoy your 4 consecutive rares.