Betwitch | Beguile

[Arum]

NAME: Betwitch ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 4 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Targeted opponent creature attacks its owner once.	NAME: Beguile ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 3 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Targeted creature attacks its owner once.

ART: None (looking for some) IDEA: Arum, inspired by other games NOTES: Basically, owner means the person who played or caused things to happen so a creature would be spawned. In this case, say, Aflatoxin, each malignant cell belongs to player 1, who cast aflatoxin on player 2's creature. But if it is due to OTHER circumstances, such as skull shield or graveyard, then the owner is the side of the field the creatures are on. SERIES: Possibly an "Effects" series, dunno.

[andretimpa]

If the opponent has (meaning it is in their field) a creature I own (meaning I'm responsible for its existence) then what is the point of casting this in that creature? (of course this would mean I can't turn this creature against my opponent). Remembering who is responsible for a creature looks like something that's easy to loose track of. Why not just say I own whatever is in my field and make things simpler?

[Captain Scibra]

This, SoSac, and an OTK setup would give you an EM.  Interesting combo.  Therefore, interesting card. :3

[Drake_XIV]

I can see the upped being used with Sings, but not enough.

[Arum]

If the opponent has (meaning it is in their field) a creature I own (meaning I'm responsible for its existence) then what is the point of casting this in that creature? (of course this would mean I can't turn this creature against my opponent). Remembering who is responsible for a creature looks like something that's easy to loose track of. Why not just say I own whatever is in my field and make things simpler?

You wouldn't. It's more for dragons and high-hit creatures.