Undead Knight l Undead Knight

[bossitron]

NAME: Undead Knight ELEMENT: Death COST: 6 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 3 TEXT: : Terrify: deal 2 damage to target creature. if this kills the target copies cannot be played for 4 turns.	NAME: Undead Knight ELEMENT: Death COST: 6 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3 | 4 TEXT: : Terrify: deal 2 damage to target creature. if this kills the target copies cannot be played for 4 turns.

ART: IDEA: NOTES: SERIES:

[Treldon]

Does 'copies' refer to copies of the Warrior or the target?

For the skill, how about Honor Duel?

[Espithel]

I don't think this card belongs in time.
The ability itself is completely fine, but is there really a reason that time should get direct damage, considering it has RT?
And I'd take RT over this effect absolutely any day. Much cheaper and less situational. And can technically do the same thing (If you can't draw those copies...)

Thematically, okay, it's an ANCIENT warrior, but I don't think that's reason enough.
"It's living, so it belongs in life"

As for the ability, I think it costs a bit too much, but then again, Owl's eye.
...
I'd prefer this as a spell, not a creature.

[montrossen]

I agree with frozen. Apart from that, this would make a very nice anti-fractal and possibly mitosis, if this covers that (Montrossen is indirectly asking you a question here).

[bossitron]

don't worry it covers mitosis.

also does anyone have a better thematic/name/ability name? PLEASE?

[montrossen]

Ancient dueler?

[Espithel]

Knight.

Chivalry IS dead, after all.

[bossitron]

modified it so that it makes more sense.

  because on death effects
  because silence

[Espithel]

I wasn't expecting death at all, but it makes so much sense now that you've suggested it.

...

I like this card a lot more now.

As a nitpick, I'd prefer it if it had 2 ATK because it deals 2 damage on the ability, but that's just for aesthetic pleasure. It can stay at 3 if you want.

[montrossen]

OK, that is a better name for sure . Im not sure about the out of element cost, even if it is kind of thematic.

[Treldon]

Looks even better

Perhaps could use a bit lower cost, 4 or 5

[iDaire]

I don't like the card.
If you kill a creature, it prevents the creature from being played for four turns.
This is OP if you look at it from a similar standpoint that I looked at it from: the enemy.
I have a  rush deck using phoenix's. I play one phoenix and then you play that undead knight. All of a sudden, I have an ash on my field and whenever I try to play a phoenix, I get an annoying card text that says "This creature can't be played for four turns."
This is overpowered. If not, then compare it to silence. Silence costs three quanta and prevents any card from being played for one turn. Your skill costs two quanta and prevents a certain creature, usually the main creature with the current meta-game, from being summoned for four turns. Four turns is all that is needed to start and end a game, as demonstrated by three turn kill decks. Four turns is all that is needed for the opponent to summon enough creatures to either win the match or guarantee the win of the match. Four turns is a long amount of time, which is why Congeal and Basilisk Blood are so powerful. Even Freeze is very powerful.
I would nerf this to one or possibly two turns. One turn means that if the creature dies, the creature can't be re-summoned next turn. Two turns could be overpowered.