Tribute | Offering

[ddevans96]

NAME: Tribute ELEMENT: Death COST: 5 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: None ABILITY: Remove two of your creatures to play one creature with a higher attack from your hand for no cost	NAME: Offering ELEMENT: Death COST: 4 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: None ABILITY: Remove two of your creatures to play one creature with a higher attack from your hand for no cost

ART: smartbizconnection.com IDEA: Myself NOTES: None SERIES: None

My next card, I managed to screw up the web address at first lol

[dragonhuman]

oh god the skeletons, but even then itd only be useful towards dragons or off element card (ie playing a ruby dragon in a pure death deck)

[Retribution]

Make a limit to "higher attack"
Or make it "higher cost"

Say, higher attack + 2/3 or higher cost + 3/4

[ddevans96]

Make a limit to "higher attack"
Or make it "higher cost"

Say, higher attack + 2/3 or higher cost + 3/4

My idea was to sacrifice two weak creatures to get a strong one, for less quantums than otherwise. Part of the game is using cards to get around stuff like limits. Like using light creatures to make it hard to be hurt (see hope)

[Retribution]

Yes, but this card would be WAY too OP. Sacrifice two malignant cells to get an ivory dragon out. Sacrifice two deja vus to get a silurian dragon out. Etc.

[ddevans96]

Yes, but this card would be WAY too OP. Sacrifice two malignant cells to get an ivory dragon out. Sacrifice two deja vus to get a silurian dragon out. Etc.

Not really. Say you have ten death quantums to play a bone dragon. It'd be easier to do that than make a malignant cell, and wait for it to duplicate so you can sacrifice them both. It's basically 10 for dragon in one turn vs. 8 for aflatoxin and 5 for tribute in two turns

[Retribution]

Yes, but this card would be WAY too OP. Sacrifice two malignant cells to get an ivory dragon out. Sacrifice two deja vus to get a silurian dragon out. Etc.

Not really. Say you have ten death quantums to play a bone dragon. It'd be easier to do that than make a malignant cell, and wait for it to duplicate so you can sacrifice them both. It's basically 10 for dragon in one turn vs. 8 for aflatoxin and 5 for tribute in two turns

I'm not talking about the situation alone, if you are running some kind of other strategy that utilizes weak monsters, you could easily get a super strong monster out at the cost of less. I guess it is sacrifice 3 cards for 1, but meh...

[Harikaze]

Imagine if someone had boneyard or something like that then
your monsters die and they get to get a dragon out
couldn't you make it
sacrafice two or more monsters to bring out one creature of equal or lower cost

[ddevans96]

Imagine if someone had boneyard or something like that then
your monsters die and they get to get a dragon out
couldn't you make it
sacrafice two or more monsters to bring out one creature of equal or lower cost

No, that ruins the entire card. Get rid of two creatures to play a weaker one, for five creatures? No way, that'd be suicidal.

[Harikaze]

Not really they could just kill off something weak like malignant

[b00mc1ap]

oh god the skeletons, but even then itd only be useful towards dragons or off element card (ie playing a ruby dragon in a pure death deck)

I think this idea of a card is plausible and would make for an interesting addition in a deck that is mostly mono but has a different element card in between. This way you don't have to pack a nova or other pillars into the deck.

I vote yes.

[ddevans96]

Not really they could just kill off something weak like malignant

Not really. Say you have ten death quantums to play a bone dragon. It'd be easier to do that than make a malignant cell, and wait for it to duplicate so you can sacrifice them both. It's basically 10 for dragon in one turn vs. 8 for aflatoxin and 5 for tribute in two turns

Clearly you didn't see this.