Traitor | Traitor

[Tymalous]

NAME: Traitor ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 8 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: N/A TEXT: The target creature attacks it's owners HP's instead of yours.

NAME: Traitor ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 7 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: N/A TEXT: The target creature attacks it's owners HP's instead of yours.

ART: No art yet IDEA: Tymalous NOTES: It's NOT the same as antimatter+liquid shadow because with LS there's poison on the creature and with AM you get healed. SERIES:

EDIT: Creating: Traitor|Traitor as a creature...  Any suggestions? Cost?


Improvement suggestions are welcome.

[Nepycros]

It's better as a Darkness card. >.> You're using the opponent's force against them.

[Tymalous]

It's better as a Darkness card. >.> You're using the opponent's force against them.

Yea I thought about that it's the only thing I wasn't sure of. Entropy is good because you get a creature to attack it's owner, and I'm not sure that would fit with darkness. If more ppl agree with you I'll change it.

[unknown89089]

How would you use this? There's not really a way to force an opponent something (except Nightmare, but they have a choice to play it or not)

[Rutarete]

How would you use this? There's not really a way to force an opponent something (except Nightmare, but they have a choice to play it or not)

(example) Your opponent has an Obsidian Dragon with eclipse on the field and used momentum on the dragon. You use this to make the dragon attack your opponent.
I think it could fit as both  and 

[unknown89089]

Oh, it's a spell, not a creature xD

[Funkyvenom]

I think this card should be in darkness because traitors are looked upon often as evil or bad. Also, a befriended creature turning upon its owner kind of reminds me of forces acting upon it.

[Nepycros]

I think this card should be in darkness because traitors are looked upon often as evil or bad. Also, a befriended creature turning upon its owner kind of reminds me of forces acting upon it.

Darkness isn't evil, never will be evil, and never has been evil. Get it right, or Bloodshadow (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22130.msg304589#msg304589) will rip you a new one.

Darkness is ideal, however, because traitors traditionally betray their allies on acts of self-preservation, which is the true nature of Darkness. Self-preservation provokes any kind of action, in almost all cases.

[Tymalous]

I think this card should be in darkness because traitors are looked upon often as evil or bad. Also, a befriended creature turning upon its owner kind of reminds me of forces acting upon it.

Darkness isn't evil, never will be evil, and never has been evil. Get it right, or Bloodshadow (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22130.msg304589#msg304589) will rip you a new one.

Darkness is ideal, however, because traitors traditionally betray their allies on acts of self-preservation, which is the true nature of Darkness. Self-preservation provokes any kind of action, in almost all cases.

Well I should be either darkness or entropy. Darkness for the reasons you just said and entropy because well, you force a creature to disobey it's owner and to attack him. It's like antimatter only with attacking, if you know what I mean.

[Nepycros]

I think this card should be in darkness because traitors are looked upon often as evil or bad. Also, a befriended creature turning upon its owner kind of reminds me of forces acting upon it.

Darkness isn't evil, never will be evil, and never has been evil. Get it right, or Bloodshadow (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22130.msg304589#msg304589) will rip you a new one.

Darkness is ideal, however, because traitors traditionally betray their allies on acts of self-preservation, which is the true nature of Darkness. Self-preservation provokes any kind of action, in almost all cases.

Well I should be either darkness or entropy. Darkness for the reasons you just said and entropy because well, you force a creature to disobey it's owner and to attack him. It's like antimatter only with attacking, if you know what I mean.

And yet, Entropy either deals with the laws of thermodynamics, or randomness. Are you being random? No? It's Darkness.

[Flayne]

I think this card should be in darkness because traitors are looked upon often as evil or bad. Also, a befriended creature turning upon its owner kind of reminds me of forces acting upon it.

Darkness isn't evil, never will be evil, and never has been evil. Get it right, or Bloodshadow (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,22130.msg304589#msg304589) will rip you a new one.

Darkness is ideal, however, because traitors traditionally betray their allies on acts of self-preservation, which is the true nature of Darkness. Self-preservation provokes any kind of action, in almost all cases.

Well I should be either darkness or entropy. Darkness for the reasons you just said and entropy because well, you force a creature to disobey it's owner and to attack him. It's like antimatter only with attacking, if you know what I mean.

And yet, Entropy either deals with the laws of thermodynamics, or randomness. Are you being random? No? It's Darkness.

ERHEM.... also Disorder
hence Anti-matter and "CHAOS" seed.
I reckon it should be an ability similar to that of Maxwells Demon.
Heck! it could be a Darkness creature with an ability that costs 3 and even be a rare! (like Arctic Squid)

If the creature's attack is greater than its defense, cast "Traitor" on the creature.
(not being serious with that one, its just an example, be creative with it)

[Cel]

I'm pretty sure you're supposed to put the card image up even if you don't yet have art for it.

Aside from that I have to agree with everyone else in that darkness seems more fitting.