Synchronised flight | Synchronised flight

[cjackdc]

NAME: Synchronised flight ELEMENT: COST: 3 : TYPE: ATK|HP: TEXT: All airborne creatures gain +1|+0 for 2 turns. Stackable.	NAME: Synchronised flight ELEMENT: COST: 2 : TYPE: ATK|HP: TEXT: All airborne creatures gain +1|+0 for 2 turns. Stackable.

ART: Art=http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/wiredscience/2010/06/starlings-e1276713669193.jpg IDEA: NOTES: SERIES:

[vivimancer]

I'm sorry this seems like an expensive version of sky blitz only a lot more useless...

[AP579]

It's a Permanent.

Does it stack? If you have 2, will all gain 4|0 (or 4|2 upped)?
This might be a little strong with nightfall, but it's fine in any other circumstance, and nightfall is hardly used anyway..

[rosutosefi]

I'm sorry this seems like an inexpensive version of sky blitz only a lot more powerful...

Fixed.

It's a Permanent.

Does it stack? If you have 2, will all gain 4|0 (or 4|2 upped)?
This might be a little strong with nightfall, but it's fine in any other circumstance, and nightfall is hardly used anyway..

Mono-dark decks need a nightfall or two.


The card is too strong. First, placing this in a mono air with wyrms or a pegasus rush will make it too strong. (Yay do this for pegasus rush! Sorry, NO.) That's 4 attack for every wyrm/peggy. I do sense that your argument is that Nightfall gives 1|1, but 1 hp is not as valuable as 1 attack. Next, I don't think anyone will want to upgrade that, except for usage with sparks/BL's, which will make it OP anyway, and a good reason for the SoP-nerf Flashback. Third, fix your tables. Look at other examples. And last, you should have added an explanation about why it will be good for the game.

[AP579]

How about putting a 3-turn timer on it?
Or maybe 2-turns?

I think the problem with this is spark. Anything that will increase HP will be OP with Sparktal.

One thing to keep in mind is that this benefits both sides almost equally (except for mono airs).

I don't think dive is THAT OP. Unless both wyrms and pegasi are used, then CP is usually superior. With 6 CP in a deck and being incredibly cheap and usually granting more than +2|+0, it should be superior to a more expensive but more mass-buff card (unless you have more than 6 diving creatures, e.g. wyrms+pegasi)

Also, "Synchronized" is spelled incorrectly.

[dracomageat]

How about "all airborne creatures get +1|+0 (+1|+1 upped?) for every 2 airborne creatures in play"? This would round down so that a solitary flier would gain nothing for thematic reasons (nothing to synchronise with). Or maybe for each one on their side would be better (still helps both players but can be used to favour the user a lot more easily).

Also, "Synchronized" is spelled incorrectly.

Actually it's not. It's just not spelt americanly.

[AP579]

That might be too strong with BL/Spark again.
+1|0 and a cost decrease after is fine with me.

Spoiler for Grammar that is getting off topic:

*googles "syncronised"*
I guess synchronised is fine, even if Windows says it's wrong. My mistake.
Also, spelled is interchangeable, but I guess that was your point anyway.

[cjackdc]

Changed it a bit, hope its better... 

[rosutosefi]

Now it's underpowered.

[cjackdc]

Underpowered? Any suggestions on how I should change it? 

[Annele]

Underpowered? Any suggestions on how I should change it?

Make it cheaper.

[cjackdc]

changed it to 3 |2