Solvent | Acid

[XYTWO]

NAME: Solvent ELEMENT: Water COST: 3 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Generate every turn. Upkeep 6.	NAME: Acid ELEMENT: Water COST: 2 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Generate every turn. Upkeep 6.

ART: http://www.sxc.hu/photo/694529 IDEA: XYTWO NOTES: The upkeep absorbs as much as it can, and if it's not enough, the card self-destructs. The upkeep is 6 random quanta. SERIES:

[Esori]

An upkeep of 6 why would anyone want to play this lol, besides in late games and for what reason

[Seraph]

you can use two quantum pillars to power this card, which will in turn generate your water poison quanta

[Nepycros]

Decrease cost by either 1 or 2.

[XYTWO]

Decrease cost by either 1 or 2.

Done. This was actually my first thought for the card, but I wasn't sure on balance and wanted to stay on the safe side.

[Essence]

The upkeep makes this card useless in basically every circumstance in which you'd want to use it.

[XYTWO]

The upkeep makes this card useless in basically every circumstance in which you'd want to use it.

Usage of Quantum Pillars makes the upkeep vanish and gives you card advantage over two pillars of each type. Also, what's your proposed change? Should I reduce the upkeep, boost the generation, lower the price, or something else?

[Manipul8r]

This card+2 Quantum Pillars => 4 pendulums.  It's not worth it because it costs 3 to play and is less reliable than just packing 3 pendulums (instead of 2 QT + this), making it weak for a duo and only okay in a rainbow with heavy Water/Death usage.

Could use a lower cost and perhaps a lower upkeep to generation trade off (like 4 upkeep + generate ).  Also maybe a cost for the upgraded or both, since you don't want to force the player to already have to play this to get more .

[XYTWO]

This card+2 Quantum Pillars => 4 pendulums.  It's not worth it because it costs 3 to play and is less reliable than just packing 3 pendulums (instead of 2 QT + this), making it weak for a duo and only okay in a rainbow with heavy Water/Death usage.

Could use a lower cost and perhaps a lower upkeep to generation trade off (like 4 upkeep + generate ).  Also maybe a cost for the upgraded or both, since you don't want to force the player to already have to play this to get more .

Hm. Thinking about it, you're probably right. I guess I'll try to keep editing this, starting with changing around the cost into .