Pet Rock|Pet Boulder

[Anarook]

NAME: Pet Rock ELEMENT: Other COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|1 TEXT: Haste. Throw: Throw Pet Rock at your opponent.	NAME: Pet Boulder ELEMENT: Other COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|2 TEXT: Roll: Roll pet boulder at your opponent.

ART: IDEA: Anarook NOTES: Part of the Passives design competition. Haste: Allows a creature to use its ability the turn it is played. Throw: Hits your opponent for 3 damage and has a 10% chance to instead inflict 1 damage to one of your opponent's creatures. This creature goes to your opponent's field after its ability is used. Roll:Hits your opponent for 5 damage and has a 10% chance to instead roll over an opponents creature, inflicting 2 damage to that creature. Goes to your opponent's field after the ability is used. Both creature damage effects are targeted at random. If there are no creatures to target, it will always hit the opponent. Not the most serious card, but it demonstrates the passive effects. SERIES:

[Flayne]

since it is for the passives competition, i dont have much of a problem with it in general, seems creative in a sense, though i dont understand why the name seems so familiar, as though a card already has this name...

I was going to suggest:

Throw pet rock at your opponent, deal X damage.
X = Pet rock's total atk.

with increased hp, I think that would have been cooler imo.

[Nepycros]

since it is for the passives competition, i dont have much of a problem with it in general, seems creative in a sense, though i dont understand why the name seems so familiar, as though a card already has this name...

I was going to suggest:

Throw pet rock at your opponent, deal X damage.
X = Pet rock's total atk.

with increased hp, I think that would have been cooler imo.

Isn't that essentially attacking the opponent, but you're sacrificing the card as well, so you can get past shields? Meh.

[bored_ninja777]

Haste = Magic... arent we supposed to refrain from copying it? I am all for cards being able to get around summoning sickness but to use the same exact word as MTG? And i agree i feel like i saw this not that long ago in card A&I not that long ago?

[Anarook]

I don't recall seeing this O_o
And I wouldn't know about the MTG thing, don't play it.

And flayne, I like the thought, but that would entail a full redesign and really overshadow the passive effect.

What about swift as the passive name instead of haste?

[bored_ninja777]

Swift is better, or go with Shard of Readiness esque and call it: Ready. 

In MTG Haste allows creatures to use their abilities and attack the turn they are summoned.