Shield Warrior | Shield Warrior (Avatar Series)

[BluePriest]

NAME: Shield Warrior ELEMENT: COST: 15 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2|5 ABILITY: All cards adjacent to shield warrior are immaterial.	NAME: Shield Warrior ELEMENT: COST: 15 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|5 ABILITY: All cards adjacent to shield warrior are immaterial.

ART: ***Insert artist name*** IDEA: BluePriest NOTES: This is NOT a standalone card. Because I know someones going to ask it, it has no attack upgraded because that way its not destroyed by fire shield. it is recieved by casting quintessence on Avatar SERIES: Avatar Series (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8947.msg113659#msg113659)

[tinkady]

its up for debate whether defensive cards should have a little amount of attack...i think they should personally. but thats not a set in stone fact...you should reduce the cost in the upped version whether it has 0 attack or not. also the card is just too expensive in general. i'd say 8 would be more reasonable, maybe even too high

[BluePriest]

its up for debate whether defensive cards should have a little amount of attack...i think they should personally. but thats not a set in stone fact...you should reduce the cost in the upped version whether it has 0 attack or not. also the card is just too expensive in general. i'd say 8 would be more reasonable, maybe even too high

None of the cards in the avatar series are meant to be fractalled. They all are going to have ridiculous cost to make sure that doesnt happen. And think about it. Play 1 of these, and you automagically are using 4 quints at once. thats 12 quanta right there.

Also, the cost may end up being irrelevant because I think this card should be immaterial as well.

[tinkady]

well its harder to control what youre quinting. and its a high aether cost so more likely to be used in a mono, which would make it right next to a bunch of immaterials anyways. and if you arent using the top and bottom layers which is common its 2 creatures at the most, could still be less than 3 or 4 with stuff in the other rows.  and its much slower than using quints- harder to draw, harder to get the quanta for. i think it needs to be less expensive.

[BluePriest]

well its harder to control what youre quinting. and its a high aether cost so more likely to be used in a mono, which would make it right next to a bunch of immaterials anyways. and if you arent using the top and bottom layers which is common its 2 creatures at the most, could still be less than 3 or 4 with stuff in the other rows.  and its much slower than using quints- harder to draw, harder to get the quanta for. i think it needs to be less expensive.

Remember, this IS NOT A STANDALONE. You are only supose to be able to play it by casting quint on Avatar. The cost is irrelevant and is just there in case it is fractaled/RTd

[tinkady]

ohhhh gotcha