Shard of Potential | Shard of Potential

[ZephyrPhantom]

NAME: Shard of Potential ELEMENT: Other COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Whenever a spell is played, gain  . Gain 3 more random quantum if your mark is  .	NAME: Shard of Potential ELEMENT: Other COST: 3 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Whenever a spell is played, gain  . Gain 3 more random quantum if your mark is  .

ART: ETG IDEA: Zblader NOTES: Card does stack. May seem pretty strong, but it's power probably will be limited by the 1.29 quantum cap. NOTE : Apparently Imageplay is temporarily down so my images may not appear on some computers. I'll try to fix this soon. SERIES:

NAME: Shard of Potential ELEMENT: Other COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Whenever a spell is played, gain . Gain 3 more random quantum if your mark is .	NAME: Shard of Potential ELEMENT: Other COST: 3 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Whenever a spell is played, gain . Gain 3 more random quantum if your mark is .

ART: ETG, Modified by Zblader IDEA: Zblader NOTES: Card does stack. Other elements might find some interesting combos with Fire, while Fire can wield potential rainbows at the cost of making it more vulnerable to cards like Black Hole. May seem pretty strong, but it's power probably will be limited by the 1.29 quantum cap. This card is mostly experimental, and I'm thinking of possible changes: Random quantum generation for both effects. Draw card for both players if a spell is played, gain if you have Mark of . Gain 3 random quantum if spell is played, summon a Photon if your mark is . SERIES:

[Lord_Jadem]

Seems far too powerful for an element that gets so many perks for quanta. I know Death has Soul Catcher which does something similar, but what is the difference between 20 and 200 Death quanta?  Practically nothing. 

It would still be an unbalancing boost to early game which for the ubiquitous fire rush is all important.  That would be especially true for the golem rush with the chance of earth quanta being generated.  We are talking about being as good as ten pillars if each player plays a card per turn.  More against Arena and FG which can often due quite a bit more.  Especially against Hourglass users.  Against FGs like Osiris 1 card could be generating 50 quanta per turn!

I admit I like fire.  Like everyone else it seems I have a fire deck for Arena play, but this seems to try to maintain the unbalanced monopoloy of Fire.  Don't believe it?  Look at the Leaderboards in Arena and count the Fire Marks in top 25.  If you see an Earth Mark in there, pretty good chance it is a Lava Rush deck too.

Fire needs to diversify a little.  Not everything has to be rush to kill and destroy.  Roast some marshmallows; make some friends before the other Elemental kick it out of the clubhouse for being a bully.

[The_Mormegil]

This seems like an intresting idea, but Fire is perhaps the less intresting element for this to be in. Maybe an element without an alternate quanta producer? I suggest Earth, adapting it to a "construction" theme.

[ZephyrPhantom]

Changed  the Element to favor Earth.

[Lord_Jadem]

Great.  Lava Destroyer fuel.

I like it better.  Only thing I would like better would be produce quanta equal to mark then give bonus if earth.  That would of course go right back to my complaint about Fire so I'll shut up.  I would hate to complain and then continue to complain after you changed it.