Vacuum | Vacuum

[WhitE-OuT]

(http://imageplay.net/)	(http://imageplay.net/)
NAME: Vacuum ELEMENT: Air COST: 6 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|4 TEXT: Played on your opponent's side of the field. All creatures on Vacuum's side of the field lose their "Airborne" ability.	NAME: Vacuum ELEMENT: Air COST: 5 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 0|4 TEXT: Played on your opponent's side of the field. All creatures on Vacuum's side of the field lose their "Airborne" ability.

ART: WhitEOuT (for now) IDEA: WhitEOuT NOTES: >Great synergy w/ Wings sheild. >If vacuum dies, creatures which had Airborne will get the ability back. SERIES: Behind the Lines (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,20260.msg274836#msg274836)

[Hyroen]

I would say --too-- much synergy with Wings. A card should help another card not make it the ultimate shield.

[ZephyrPhantom]

I would say --too-- much synergy with Wings. A card should help another card not make it the ultimate shield.

Agreed. How about "25% chance to delay Airborne Creatures for 1 turn" instead?  This card could also drain quanta considering it's a vacuum, so sucking up quanta is something I wouldn't find unnatural either.

[WhitE-OuT]

I would say --too-- much synergy with Wings. A card should help another card not make it the ultimate shield.

Agreed. How about "25% chance to delay Airborne Creatures for 1 turn" instead?  This card could also drain quanta considering it's a vacuum, so sucking up quanta is something I wouldn't find unnatural either.

Or what about alternation? 50/50 to delay airborne creatures or drain ~3

[7wavemaster]

I would say --too-- much synergy with Wings. A card should help another card not make it the ultimate shield.

Agreed. How about "25% chance to delay Airborne Creatures for 1 turn" instead?  This card could also drain quanta considering it's a vacuum, so sucking up quanta is something I wouldn't find unnatural either.

Or what about alternation? 50/50 to delay airborne creatures or drain ~3

Prefer drain because a vacuum is pretty consistent.

[wizelsnarf]

Wouldn't  they all die from a lack of air pretty quickly, let alone be unable to fly?

[WhitE-OuT]

Prefer drain because a vacuum is pretty consistent.

The reason i don't like that idea is because then its only useful against decks with .

I would say --too-- much synergy with Wings. A card should help another card not make it the ultimate shield.

Dimensional Shield: 6 for 3 invulnerable turns. Ratio 10:5
Wings + Vacuum: 8 for 5 invulnerable turns. Ratio 8:5
Phase Sheild: 5 for 3 invulnerable turns. Ratio 8.3:5
Wings(UP) + Vacuum(UP): 6 for 5 invulnerable turns. Ratio 6:5

As compared to Phase shield, if it continues with the "no airborne" ability, it is more cost efficient, BUT much easier to destroy (since its a creature/shield, rather than just a shield) so IMO just as OP as Phase shield.