Scythe Of Souls | Scythe of Souls (upgraded)

[Retribution]

NAME: Scythe Of Souls ELEMENT: COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: 3/5, when flying. TEXT: Weapon: Deal 3 + X damage at the end of every turn. X is the amount of creatures killed since Scythe was played.	NAME: Scythe Of Souls ELEMENT: COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: 4/5, when flying TEXT: Weapon: Deal 4 + X damage at the end of every turn. X is the amount of creatures killed since Scythe was played.

ART: In need of art - looking for an artist to draw one! (or edit one) Karma might be good motivation... IDEA: Retribution NOTES: If this card is too overpowered, I might set a cap so that X cannot go above 10. 13 seems relevant since it's unlucky, too. SERIES: ---

Feedback please!
Look at ART and NOTES section for more details.

[Wonder]

I think this would be better under 
A cool idea though~

[Retribution]

I think this would be better under 
A cool idea though~

Bleah, I don't know why I didn't put it under death  -brainfreeze-

But would it be good if dark gained something like this as well to help dark/death duos or simply not keep this kind of effect only for the death element? idk.

[OldTrees]

I think this would be better under 
A cool idea though~

Bleah, I don't know why I didn't put it under death  -brainfreeze-

But would it be good if dark gained something like this as well to help dark/death duos or simply not keep this kind of effect only for the death element? idk.

No. Elements should only gain cards that fit in their element. This is a uniquely Death effect and not close to a Dark effect.
It looks in the ballpark as a Death card. Might deserve a +2 attack increase though.

[QuantumT]

The attack is fine. If anything it could stand to go down. Death is capable of triggering a ridiculous number of death effects in a very short time. See DoSA for an example.

[OldTrees]

The attack is fine. If anything it could stand to go down. Death is capable of triggering a ridiculous number of death effects in a very short time. See DoSA for an example.

See Vulture for an example.

+1|0 per death should be valued at +2 - +4 (-1 - +1 after the -3 weapon cost reduction is accounted for)

Also remember this has to compete with Arsenic which automatically grows by +1|0 per turn.

[Agroagro]

I like!

clean simple concept! those are the best ones. I agree it does seem suiting to death but darkness is fine to.

[QuantumT]

The attack is fine. If anything it could stand to go down. Death is capable of triggering a ridiculous number of death effects in a very short time. See DoSA for an example.

See Vulture for an example.

+1|0 per death should be valued at +2 - +4 (-1 - +1 after the -3 weapon cost reduction is accounted for)

Also remember this has to compete with Arsenic which automatically grows by +1|0 per turn.

The initial 0|1 vulture is much more fragile then a weapon. It's a good point though.

[OldTrees]

The attack is fine. If anything it could stand to go down. Death is capable of triggering a ridiculous number of death effects in a very short time. See DoSA for an example.

See Vulture for an example.

+1|0 per death should be valued at +2 - +4 (-1 - +1 after the -3 weapon cost reduction is accounted for)

Also remember this has to compete with Arsenic which automatically grows by +1|0 per turn.

The initial 0|1 vulture is much more fragile then a weapon. It's a good point though.

Yeah the additional fragility is acounted in the atk+0 and atk+1 versions. If it were a creature with +1|0 per death I would have that cost less than vulture by 1 .

[QuantumT]

The attack is fine. If anything it could stand to go down. Death is capable of triggering a ridiculous number of death effects in a very short time. See DoSA for an example.

See Vulture for an example.

+1|0 per death should be valued at +2 - +4 (-1 - +1 after the -3 weapon cost reduction is accounted for)

Also remember this has to compete with Arsenic which automatically grows by +1|0 per turn.

But a weapon is naturally more resilient than a creature. I wouldn't give it any reduction for that.

The initial 0|1 vulture is much more fragile then a weapon. It's a good point though.

Yeah the additional fragility is acounted in the atk+0 and atk+1 versions. If it were a creature with +1|0 per death I would have that cost less than vulture by 1 .

[QuantumT]

*snip*
Yeah the additional fragility is acounted in the atk+0 and atk+1 versions. If it were a creature with +1|0 per death I would have that cost less than vulture by 1 .

But a weapon is naturally more resilient than a creature. I wouldn't give it any reduction for that.

[OldTrees]

*snip*
Yeah the additional fragility is acounted in the atk+0 and atk+1 versions. If it were a creature with +1|0 per death I would have that cost less than vulture by 1 .

But a weapon is naturally more resilient than a creature. I wouldn't give it any reduction for that.

Which is why I suggested the cost=atk+0 version which is a 50% increase from the balanced creature cost for the equivalent skill. (+50% derived from venom/Arsenic)