Sakura | Cherry Sakura v2

[iDaire]

NAME: Sakura ELEMENT: Entropy COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 5 | 1 TEXT: When this creature dies, seven quanta from one of the opponent's pools are destroyed.	NAME: Cherry Sakura ELEMENT: Entropy COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6 | 1 TEXT: When this creature dies, ten quanta from one of the opponent's pools are destroyed.

ART: http://freetopwallpaper.com/sakura-flowers-wallpaper-hd/ IDEA: iDaire NOTES: Sakura | Cherry Sakura Explanation: Upon this creature's death, seven quanta from one of the twelve types of Elements the opponent has is destroyed. Don't get the effect confused with Discord's. Whereas Discord destroys random quanta, Sakura destroys quanta from a random pool. Usage: Effective in stopping your opponent from playing Mass CC | Can be fodder for Otyugh or Scavenger | Quanta Denial Balance Notes: Update Notes: The creature's HP stats have been changed and Sakura is now a mid-hitter for Entropy. Information: This is one of the flowers of the set where the effect of the flower has absolutely nothing to do with what the card does in real life. So why'd I do it? Well, Entropy is synonymous with randomized destruction, as emphasized by Fallen Druid, Pandemonium, Chaos Seed, and Discord. So, an entropic Flower should follow suit. Entropy has almost no form of protection when it comes to CC, so this idea was born. Entire flower set can be found here. SERIES:

[OldTrees]

This card is not self sufficient.
Either give the opponent a reason to destroy it (better option) or give it a way out.

[iancudorinmarian]

Spoiler for Hidden:

I expected her. Oh well.

I guess the card could work with immolation or gravity pull, but other than that it's pretty useless. Or maybe with otyugh, like you mentioned. Maybe a crazy CP+oty+Sakura deck.

[iDaire]

I'll probably restore the previous iteration where Sakura's health drops every turn.

[OldTrees]

I'll probably restore the previous iteration where Sakura's health drops every turn.

I would suggest considering the other option(give the opponent a reason to maybe kill it) since it adds more interaction to the card.

[Espithel]

I would suggest considering the other option(give the opponent a reason to maybe kill it) since it adds more interaction to the card.

[OldTrees]

I would suggest considering the other option(give the opponent a reason to maybe kill it) since it adds more interaction to the card.

You don't need to give the opponent the ability to destroy it, merely the incentive. Then the opponent is trapped between suffering it to live or spend CC & lose quanta to remove it.

[foxrain4]

i like this card but using one card to reduce opponent random quanta by 7 without
any other effects or attack power seems a bit weak.

[iDaire]

I changed the stats. Would this be much better than Sakura was in its previous version?
Sakura deals more damage and is now more pestering to the opponent. In quantity, the opponent is forced to remove Sakura or being subject to greater amounts of damage.

[foxrain4]

I changed the stats. Would this be much better than Sakura was in its previous version?
Sakura deals more damage and is now more pestering to the opponent. In quantity, the opponent is forced to remove Sakura or being subject to greater amounts of damage.

it definitely looks good and more playable now
but its probably overpowered, probably lowering the stats to 2/1 or 3/1 is good.

[iDaire]

Rawr. That's similar to what it was before.

[foxrain4]

Rawr. That's similar to what it was before.

sorry what i saw was actually 0/3 Sakura...