Quantum Loadstone | Quantum Loadstar

[Agroagro]

NAME: Quantum Loadstone ELEMENT: Other COST: 2 TYPE: Permanent  ATK|HP: - TEXT: Each turn generates the quantum used in its casting.	NAME: Quantum Loadstar ELEMENT: Other COST: 2 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: - TEXT: Each turn generates the quantum used in its casting. If destroyed return its casting cost to owner.

ART: Agroagro / photoshop IDEA: Agroagro NOTES: Felt there is room for something like this in the game. SERIES:

[achangeofpace]

I think the upped version is a little UP

[OldTrees]

This has a 0%/50%/75% (Mono/Duo/Trio) chance of being a duo pillar that produces 1 quanta per turn.

The upgrade does not feel worth it. Perhaps have it return 1 quanta when played in addition?

I am not sure why this should coexist with pendulums (however there may be a reason)

[Agroagro]

This has a 0%/50%/75% (Mono/Duo/Trio) chance of being a duo pillar that produces 1 quanta per turn.

The upgrade does not feel worth it. Perhaps have it return 1 quanta when played in addition?

I am not sure why this should coexist with pendulums (however there may be a reason)

Its ment to produce 2 quantum per turn.

and, you have the ability to control (to a certain extent) what type of quantum you want to produce. The pendulum revolve around your mark. and quantum pillar produce randomly. With the loadstone you know what your getting.

I think the upped version is a little UP

I came up with the un-upped version first. I didnt really know what to do with the upped version. returning the quanta seems like a good idea.

Thanks for the feed back

[OldTrees]

Ah if it produces 2 quanta per turn that is a different manner.
That does kinda limit its balancing variables.

Obviously although this looks like it costs in reality it costs trio/quad quanta.
This means the cost is at least equivalent to 2 elemental quanta if not 3.
In return it acts like 2 cards instead of 1.

I think the unupped is balanced. The upgraded can be balanced by mirroring pillars|towers and removing the current upgrade bonus.

This works as nice quanta acceleration and trio/quad quanta fixation.
Chance of producing two types of quanta 67%/75% (I miscalculated before.)

[Agroagro]

Obviously although this looks like it costs in reality it costs trio/quad quanta.
This means the cost is at least equivalent to 2 elemental quanta if not 3.
In return it acts like 2 cards instead of 1.

What do you mean here? I dont think I understand when you say "the cost is at least equivalent to 2 elemental quanta if not 3." how could the card cost 3?

You get the concept. It stablizes 3+ element decks or is quanta acceleration for decks that need a certain type.

[OldTrees]

Obviously although this looks like it costs in reality it costs trio/quad quanta.
This means the cost is at least equivalent to 2 elemental quanta if not 3.
In return it acts like 2 cards instead of 1.

What do you mean here? I dont think I understand when you say "the cost is at least equivalent to 2 elemental quanta if not 3." how could the card cost 3?

You get the concept. It stablizes 3+ element decks or is quanta acceleration for decks that need a certain type.

There are two common types of quanta: Elemental Quanta [ , , , , , , , , , , or ] and Rainbow/other quanta [ ].
I convert all values into elemental quanta.

Commonly combos that cost 2 + 3 are equated to (2+3)+1=6 . This takes into account the additional difficulty of efficiently using two+ types of quanta.

[rohlfo]

I think the upped version could cost 3 or 4, that's not much more cost, but more quanta gain each turn!

[OldTrees]

I think the upped version could cost 3 or 4, that's not much more cost, but more quanta gain each turn!

2 quanta acceleration is powerful enough. 3-4 quanta acceleration would be ridiculous on a single card.

[Agroagro]

I thought about 3 quantum but thought it was two powerful as well. That and it could be harder to set up in multi color decks.