New Card Idea - Feedback/Backlash

[ScytherLoL]

Awesome I look forward to seeing the template, don't worry about throwing it out there the card is good just may need some tweaking to make it the best it can be.

All in all a great ability and well received so far.

I think nonstacking is a better way to go and would prefer it to work like Eclipse/Nightfall also.

Having it available to be destroyed is good too as it means that either you or they can remove it if you need it gone.

Good luck

Scyther

[becarem]

This card is a great idea, no matter what wording you choose or what color you make it.  It would definitely give a reason for creature decks to be careful, and no, I don't think it would change the basic game at all...unless your idea of the game is entirely dependent on creatures. 

Sure, many creatures are designed to sit on your front lines and spam their ability 'til doomsday, and true, creatures cannot be ignored in this game.  But really, is adding this card concept so bad?  The point of the game, to me, is to challenge dominant deck strategies and shifting the balance of power whenever it gets out of hand.  Can we not agree that activated creature abilities could use something to fear?  Especially in the PvP department, AI might need coding to notice this card.

[icybraker]

Good idea, upgraded version is too powerful. Just make the cost go down to 4 rather than make it do 2 damage, because that is very overpowered.

And just to clarify things a bit, change "ability with a cost" to "active ability". Active abilities are like Otyugh's Devour and the FFQ's Firefly are active; the Ray of Light's quanta generating ability and the Sapphire Charger's momentum ability are passive.

[Bloodshadow]

I like this idea, but the upgraded version is too powerful. Just make it cost less to summon.