Nebula | Nebula

[Prnc Athrr]

Element really, really does not fit.

There is no Galaxy element. So, air?

[Prnc Athrr]

No rude or Harming, but:

1.IMO, generating Super(Nova) AND Black Hole (if destoyed) is too much, I know that when star
is destroyed it generate Super(Nova) and Black Hole (or Neutron).. But no be too astronomist..

But, you guys can concern me why I should put Black Hole.

[Naesala]

Element really, really does not fit.

There is no Galaxy element. So, air?

*cough* AETHER *cough* OR GRAVITY *cough*

[Prnc Athrr]

Element really, really does not fit.

There is no Galaxy element. So, air?

*cough* AETHER *cough* OR GRAVITY *cough*

Sir, you want cough medication?
JK... Aether? I don't think.. so.. Well, gravity might fit , right?

[Naesala]

Quote from the game:
"Aether is the domain of the immobile things; it is where the stars reside and the media where all the energy moves." "Gravity elementals deal with mass and size..."
So either fits. I believe its commonly agreed that aether is equivalent to space based on that definition and the fact that it is the opposite of time.

As a gravity card, gravity activation, to make a light and fire producing permanent we could have Trio decks using Armagio, Graviton fireeaters, rage pots and archangels, logically targeted for destruction with little gain (recommend changing nova/supernova to blackhole possibly to make the decision to destroy it more strategic)
As an aether card, gravity activation, to make a light and fire producing permanent it would most likely have to go in a rainbow hoping the AI would be dumb and destroy it for the nova (weak card in pvp, average over all, maybe a rainbow heavy in fire and light)

Based on that, I vote gravity.

[Prnc Athrr]

Quote from the game:
"Aether is the domain of the immobile things; it is where the stars reside and the media where all the energy moves." "Gravity elementals deal with mass and size..."
So either fits. I believe its commonly agreed that aether is equivalent to space based on that definition and the fact that it is the opposite of time.

As a gravity card, gravity activation, to make a light and fire producing permanent we could have Trio decks using Armagio, Graviton fireeaters, rage pots and archangels, logically targeted for destruction with little gain (recommend changing nova/supernova to blackhole possibly to make the decision to destroy it more strategic)
As an aether card, gravity activation, to make a light and fire producing permanent it would most likely have to go in a rainbow hoping the AI would be dumb and destroy it for the nova (weak card in pvp, average over all, maybe a rainbow heavy in fire and light)

Based on that, I vote gravity.

Sorry, but air look more fit comparing aether or grav.. Aether deal with immobility and electricity while gravity deal with massive HP, momentum and attraction (not the beauty thing).. Air element control any sky or gaseous substance like nebula

[Naesala]

1) Did you even read what I said? I specifically bolded that aether is where stars reside (space) and other cards/card ideas agree (space) and its the opposite of time (space). Nebulas reside in space. Air is more about controlling the atmosphere or the wind on a planet than gaseous elements (this is fantasy elements, not scientific elements). Gravity isnt as strong as aether thematically (nebulas are space debris and so on pulled together by gravitational forces) but it fits as well or better than air.
2)If you dont want a different card for thematic reasons, you might want to read the mechanical reasons. Quartets are the most difficult decks to build and balance and the elements offered here dont work well together.

I recommend a poll at the very least.

[Prnc Athrr]

1) Did you even read what I said? I specifically bolded that aether is where stars reside (space) and other cards/card ideas agree (space) and its the opposite of time (space). Nebulas reside in space. Air is more about controlling the atmosphere or the wind on a planet than gaseous elements (this is fantasy elements, not scientific elements). Gravity isnt as strong as aether thematically (nebulas are space debris and so on pulled together by gravitational forces) but it fits as well or better than air.
2)If you dont want a different card for thematic reasons, you might want to read the mechanical reasons. Quartets are the most difficult decks to build and balance and the elements offered here dont work well together.

I recommend a poll at the very least.

Okay2, Let's make it cool.. You win

[Rutarete]

Quartets are the most difficult decks to build and balance and the elements offered here dont work well together.

This card can only help that though. Why should that be a reason to not have a card that gives great quartet opportunity?

[Prnc Athrr]

Quartets are the most difficult decks to build and balance and the elements offered here dont work well together.

This card can only help that though. Why should that be a reason to not have a card that gives great quartet opportunity?

Light and Fire synergies..

[Prnc Athrr]

Does anyone have any question or reason this can't be submitted?

 

[EmeraldTiger]

Art is needed for star, and maybe the other part, unless the link to current art can be provided and is copyright free.