Sorry, I don't want to see this card idea but I had to with the second option because their was no option saying "No. (Posting suggestions)" I don't want to see this card because I think its too complex. Heck, I don't even know how to make that symbol with my current keyboard and explaining it, in depth, could be hard to explain to a kid like someone in kong. The not being able to make that symbol also affects how effective I can be when someone asks what does it do. I also don't even know how to use that symbol in algebra. According to the notes its the opposite of maxwells demon. Well, if its 100% opposite, then its OP. Max wells demon is balanced because it can only really negate high attack opponents creature's from doing too much damage as repeatable CC and the drawback is its super expensive. This would allow you to get rid of most of the weaker creatures in the game that often are in total damage or ability effectiveness greater than the big creatures. It also has way too much synergy with max wells demon especially with this being an entropy card. It might fit in gravity mechanics cause OTY, but then most cases Oty>Minwells Angel. Thus Id rather just not see this card in the game. I would not cast my vote to be so condescending as the "no, it's stupid." But a simple "No." I would. Thus I think with how you set up the polls the polls arn't accurate, at least, for my vote anyway.
Thanks for the detailed reply.
First, the poll - it was opened back when it was in Humor, to see whether it should be moved to CIA. So it was not meant for the actual usage of the card
But, for further votes I have changed it to a simple No
The text - I also had to Google up the code for the symbols. But for easier usage it can simply be switched back to the original version
As for balance - it is not balanced (yet). Nor was it meant to be. But people seemed to like the idea (so far) so it has been moved here from Humor to get some real consideration
Looks like a pointless card to me, sorry.
Not necessarily. It can work as anti CC for FFQ and Scarab decks, or as CC against dragons
Why do you need the symbol? You could just write "Redistribute creature HP evenly." or something like that.
The original text was
Algebra:
Rebalance the HP of all creatures in play. Take from the rich, give to the poor
Then I thought 'Hey, if it's Algebra, why not include it in the description'
But I agree that it might be difficult for people to understand