Meteor | Meteorite

[DesolateSoul14]

Someone said this on page two:  Give it both momentum and immaterial.  Yes, I know it is a rock (quite material), but then again flying creatures die in a flood..  Other than the logic imperfection, it would be fine and not UP or OP.

I agree. But it should really be a spell, because
a. It's not living (yes I know other creatures on this game aren't alive either, but still.)
b. People could buff it (very dangerous)
c. It's an immediate effect, thats it. That's the definition of spells on this game.

[AnonymousRevival]

Make it cost and deal three damage to the targeted creature.

[Vineroz]

Someone said this on page two:  Give it both momentum and immaterial.  Yes, I know it is a rock (quite material), but then again flying creatures die in a flood..  Other than the logic imperfection, it would be fine and not UP or OP.

I agree. But it should really be a spell, because
a. It's not living (yes I know other creatures on this game aren't alive either, but still.)
b. People could buff it (very dangerous)
c. It's an immediate effect, thats it. That's the definition of spells on this game.

I totally agree with you. Therefore I propose:

make it a spell. put 10 damage on your opponents HP. No targeting is required so it can bypass reflective shields. Cost can be like 2 for unupped / 1 for upped (considering Lightning).

[AnonymousRevival]

Make it 4: fire, for lightning does half the damage for 2 .

[Vineroz]

Make it 4: fire, for lightning does half the damage for 2 .

But this one can only target opponent's HP, while Lightning is more flexible.

[AnonymousRevival]

So its 3:fire because it can only target the opponent?

[ddevans96]

So its 3:fire because it can only target the opponent?

Lightning can also be CC.

[AnonymousRevival]

Meteor doesn't have CC, that's why it is cheaper, because it can only affect the opponent.