Malignant Lord | Malignant Lord

[ice_heart]

NAME: Malignant Lord ELEMENT: Death COST: 7 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: N|N+1 ABILITY: N = the number of malignant cells at your side.	NAME: Malignant Lord ELEMENT: Death COST: 8 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: N+1|N+2 ABILITY: N = the number of malignant cells at your side.

ART: Same as Element's Malignant Cell Artist - Heavily edited IDEA: Ice_heart NOTES: Maybe not an original idea, but an interesting one. SERIES:

[$$$man]

wow OP thats all i can say

dont make it passive but make it so that its a one time ability use, still might be OP

[ice_heart]

Well, I don't really think it's overpowered:

1- you must have a creature (has some quanta cost - mostly)
2- then you have to aflatoxin it (has a relative high cost to cast)
3- wait the creature to die (another cost => the creature)
4- put this creature into play (has a relativa high cost to cast)
5- wait the malignant cells to spread

Maybe stuck it on a bauble for N turns? Or something like that?

[$$$man]

Well, I don't really think it's overpowered:

1- you must have a creature (has some quanta cost - mostly)
2- then you have to aflatoxin it (has a relative high cost to cast)
3- wait the creature to die (another cost => the creature)
4- put this creature into play (has a relativa high cost to cast)
5- wait the malignant cells to spread

Maybe stuck it on a bauble for N turns? Or something like that?

i agree with you on the high cost and time it takes but remember that death has a nice stall(bone wall+SoG's) so it shouldnt be that hard to get the combo going, but now that i think about it you are paying a total of 14 quanta + like 4 turns to fill up for a 22|22 so it is not that op, get more feedback and if everyone says it may be UP then add scavenger to it 

[Xoned]

Its element is other yet it costs to play it?
It should be N/2 | N+1 IMO.

[miniwally]

Its element is other yet it costs to play it?
It should be N/2 | N+1 IMO.

The elements look at the border.

[Xoned]

Its element is other yet it costs to play it?
It should be N/2 | N+1 IMO.

The elements look at the border.

Missed the pattern. I need a new monitor.
Still, this + 22 malig cells is a 22|23 creature, I think (N/2) 11|23 is more reasonable.
Or maybe unupped is N/2 | N+1 and upped is N | N/2 (rounded up). That way you have to time it with atleast one malig cell on the feild to keep it alive. That should balance out the high attack.

[Harikaze]

hmm ._. ANTIMATTER GO!!!

[actionjack]

Love the picture!

[slovenc555]

naaaah, the malignant cells are suposed to be bad in every way, not good for something, you waoul ruuin the idea man

[Lifestream]

  nice picture, and maybe add a number of turns it lives?

[King of doom]

Awesome card!