*Author

Offline FrostguardTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • Frostguard is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • New to Elements
Re: Jinx | Hex https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=29339.msg374551#msg374551
« Reply #12 on: August 02, 2011, 12:53:42 am »
I'd love if it wasn't an active skill. Think : reducing attack so creature with nice abilities aren't affected by shields?
I didn't mean so. I mean, I imagined that it would have a counter and this would not be an active skill.

For the cost i almost think this card is UP and the cost should be reduced. I mean lightning kills most creatures right then and there and costs 1 upgraded. and this form of cc is extremely slow.

shrieker 8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1=36 damage and 8 turns before it finally gets 0 attack. granted shrieker isnt a typical card, the time it takes to finally be decently effective is a nerf of its own and the cost should be reduced
That would be reasonable. How about a -2 | 0 or rather a creature that can cast this spell (and, of course, like the poison counter, it stacks)?

Offline Sevs

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2007
  • Country: us
  • Reputation Power: 26
  • Sevs is a proud Wyrm taking wing for the first time.Sevs is a proud Wyrm taking wing for the first time.Sevs is a proud Wyrm taking wing for the first time.Sevs is a proud Wyrm taking wing for the first time.Sevs is a proud Wyrm taking wing for the first time.
  • My favorite element is Oxygen
  • Awards: Slice of Elements 3rd Birthday CakeWeekly Tournament WinnerWeekly Tournament Winner
Re: Jinx | Hex https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=29339.msg374757#msg374757
« Reply #13 on: August 02, 2011, 03:23:16 pm »
-2|0 is much better and would probably be 4 and 3 cost but i would keep it at -1|0 for 2 and 1 cost. If a creature had that power then it would probably have to be 2-3 quanta for -1|0 because it is reusable
"Elements is the greatest game ever made" - Abraham Lincoln

Offline maverixk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 508
  • Reputation Power: 7
  • maverixk is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • I have an 'x' instead of a 'c'. I know you jellin'
Re: Jinx | Hex https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=29339.msg374761#msg374761
« Reply #14 on: August 02, 2011, 03:43:46 pm »
Maybe you could make it relative to the creature's attack when this spell is played. More attack equals -2 or such, less equals -1.
"Are you ... comparing me to God? I mean, that's great, but just so you know, I've never made a tree." -House

Offline FrostguardTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • Frostguard is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • New to Elements
Re: Jinx | Hex https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=29339.msg375093#msg375093
« Reply #15 on: August 03, 2011, 01:42:11 pm »
Thank you for the ideas, really.
As I've got many different ideas, I think I will add a poll to see which one would be the best choice.

Offline FrostguardTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • Frostguard is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • New to Elements
Re: Jinx | Hex https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=29339.msg375341#msg375341
« Reply #16 on: August 04, 2011, 01:36:45 am »
Anybody who wants to vote?
With Entrench | Burrow gone, this is the second card I'd like to submit to the Crucible. In case nobody thought of this idea before me, of course.

Offline FrostguardTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
  • Reputation Power: 2
  • Frostguard is a Spark waiting for a buff.
  • New to Elements
Re: Jinx | Hex https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=29339.msg375972#msg375972
« Reply #17 on: August 05, 2011, 07:32:59 pm »
I've been waiting for a while, and after several days, I viewed the results. I chose the option which got the most votes (it got 1 vote out of the total 1), so it wasn't such a hard decision.
The target now gets -2 | 0 after each successful attack.

 

blarg: