Insulator Emission | Insulator Emission

[TheAccuso]

NAME: Insulator Emission ELEMENT: Life COST: 7 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Target creature can not be directly targeted. Adjacent creatures die.	NAME: Insulator Emission ELEMENT: Life COST: 5 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Target creature can not be directly targeted. Adjacent creatures die.

ART: http://it.fotopedia.com/items/flickr-2875499420 IDEA: THEACCUSO NOTES: Adjacent creatures die: http://imageplay.net/img/m7Gbd81866/orderactions.png Example: Insulator Emission gets played on creature on spot n°7, every creature on spots n° 12;20;3;8;16 die, also if summoned after Insulator Emission is played. SERIES:

[EmeraldTiger]

Anti-CC with limitation?

[Drake_XIV]

This is weaker than Quintessence, so why is it more expensive?

[TheAccuso]

This is weaker than Quintessence, so why is it more expensive?

Because of the killing potential.
Imagine to use it on opponent full field.

[Drake_XIV]

This is weaker than Quintessence, so why is it more expensive?

Because of the killing potential.
Imagine to use it on opponent full field.

Oh, it lasts even after it's played.  Interesting.  Anyways, 7/5 still seems expensive.  Why not 5/4 or 6/5?  Because most decks rarely get that many creatures out, in my experience.

[TheAccuso]

This is weaker than Quintessence, so why is it more expensive?

Because of the killing potential.
Imagine to use it on opponent full field.

Oh, it lasts even after it's played.  Interesting.  Anyways, 7/5 still seems expensive.  Why not 5/4 or 6/5?  Because most decks rarely get that many creatures out, in my experience.

Fact is that the cost value can't be lowered that much because of the continuous death effect, so i'll take your first noitification as a tip and may make the death effect trigger only when I.E. is casted and so lowering the cost to 5/4 maybe.
Thx 4 the feedback;

[Rutarete]

This is weaker than Quintessence, so why is it more expensive?

Because of the killing potential.
Imagine to use it on opponent full field.

Oh, it lasts even after it's played.  Interesting.  Anyways, 7/5 still seems expensive.  Why not 5/4 or 6/5?  Because most decks rarely get that many creatures out, in my experience.

They may not get that many creatures out, but an instant kill that disregards hp should be more expensive anyway, because of that fact.

[Nepycros]

It kills even when monsters are played in the future? If it's played on the very center, every creature played after that dies. I suggest changing the mechanic.

[TheAccuso]

It kills even when monsters are played in the future? If it's played on the very center, every creature played after that dies. I suggest changing the mechanic.

Kinda working on it
Quote from: THEACCUSO on Today at 06:57:00 PM
I may make the death effect trigger only when I.E. is casted and so lowering the cost to 5/4 maybe.
Do you have any idea?
Another one may be to totally remove the killing part and just let it be a worst version of quintessence but cheaper like3/2, but i personally don't like to have a card so similar.

[Drake_XIV]

It kills even when monsters are played in the future? If it's played on the very center, every creature played after that dies. I suggest changing the mechanic.

Actually, would kill anything past the 3rd creature until the 6th.