Water Lily | Water Lily

[Pineapple]

NAME: Water Lily ELEMENT: Water COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4|0 TEXT: Gains -1/+1 when submerged. : Mitosis	NAME: Water Lily ELEMENT: Water COST: 2 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6|0 TEXT: Gains -1/+1 when submerged. : Mitosis

ART: ***Insert artist name*** IDEA: patchx94 NOTES: v2: mitosis costs water, 4 and 6 attack v1: mitosis costs life, 3 and 5 attack "submerged" means in the top or bottom row when flooding is in play Water lilies are known to be invasive in still waters. SERIES: ***Insert series name and link to series page (if any)***

[Nepycros]

I C wut u did thar.

Mitosis costs equal to the cost of the original creature. Now for balancing.

You went for the Spark approach, so we'll ignore the 3 attack thar.

The skill normally costs 4. -1 for duo element, -1 for constantly producing creatures that die if not underwater, so I think that raising the cost of the ability by 1 would suffice.

[Ekki]

IMO, this is either UP or just unuseful... We need more Flooding mechanisms before any "underwater" mechanic can be successfully implemented.
Right now it:
Works with Flooding (dunno how well), and ONLY with Flooding.
It's UP with any other combos. Buffing it is a Trio, and anyways, not a great deal. If not, it's overshadowed by spark.

I think the community isn't ready to balance this stuff, but that's just my .50 

[Pineapple]

I C wut u did thar.

Mitosis costs equal to the cost of the original creature. Now for balancing.

You went for the Spark approach, so we'll ignore the 3 attack thar.

The skill normally costs 4. -1 for duo element, -1 for constantly producing creatures that die if not underwater, so I think that raising the cost of the ability by 1 would suffice.

We could hypothetically add another -1 because you need support cards (fractal and flooding, hp buffs, etc) since it's a pretty bad card if you ignore the skill and because the only way to spam ones that don't die instantly

I think you're going about it wrong, though.

compare with ash eater and minor phoenix.

+2 for generating creatures for equal quanta (like pharoah) -1 for being situational -1 for being duo

[Pineapple]

V2 marker

IMO, this is either UP or just unuseful... We need more Flooding mechanisms before any "underwater" mechanic can be successfully implemented.
Right now it:
Works with Flooding (dunno how well), and ONLY with Flooding.
It's UP with any other combos. Buffing it is a Trio, and anyways, not a great deal. If not, it's overshadowed by spark.

I think the community isn't ready to balance this stuff, but that's just my .50 

buffing it isn't a trio anymore?