*Author

slovenc555

  • Guest
Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21356#msg21356
« on: January 29, 2010, 05:33:38 pm »
Something i made COMPLETLY with photoshop.

bobcamel

  • Guest
Re: Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21403#msg21403
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2010, 09:11:02 pm »
Quintessence is better. Make this card much cheaper.

...actually, it might be not as bad, as it does what my Safety can do... Still, more like 4 cost on the upgrade and 2 on the base would be better.

assassim

  • Guest
Re: Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21438#msg21438
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2010, 11:16:51 pm »
The upgraded version has too much of a gap compared to the normal version (more than double) and the cost is the same. Either Up the cost or reduce the ammount of turns.

The idea itself is great! For Quint. the monster cannot be targeted AT ALL, by harmful effects or helpful. With this card the creature gains temp. immortality and you are able to buff it. However, the main problem is that how do you decide whether a spell is harmful or helpful. Take mutation for example, you have no idea whether its going to give you something good or a piece of garbage. Or rage potion as another example, the +5 is a buff, but the there's also the -5. I don't think that the game can be programmed with a bias that humans have.

bobcamel

  • Guest
Re: Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21447#msg21447
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2010, 11:42:51 pm »
I say, let's make it

"Only owner of the creature can target it"

and it'll be alright.

slovenc555

  • Guest
Re: Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21643#msg21643
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2010, 10:36:54 am »
how about this: no time limited effect, just can only be targeted by owner? of course thet would make it more costly, since it would be acctually better than quintesance. *awaits reply eagerly*

Note: I will not edit the cards until answer comes in.

bobcamel

  • Guest
Re: Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21668#msg21668
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2010, 12:14:12 pm »
No, that's so strong it should not be implemented, ever.

Give a time limit.

slovenc555

  • Guest
Re: Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21672#msg21672
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2010, 12:41:18 pm »
EDITED! You like?


OFF TOPIC MESSAGE INCOMING! Bobcamel, why did you change your pic? The old one is/was better.

bobcamel

  • Guest
Re: Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21675#msg21675
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2010, 12:47:15 pm »
Awesome now

slovenc555

  • Guest
Re: Preservation/Conservation https://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php?topic=2634.msg21676#msg21676
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2010, 12:55:59 pm »
WoW, that has never happened to me before. I mean that somebody acctually thinks one of my ideas is "awesome".

 

anything
blarg: