Goblin Laborer | Goblin Captain

[crystalmakwer]

NAME: Goblin Laborer ELEMENT: Fire COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2|3 TEXT: :sacrifice one pillar, one tower or one pendulum to deal 3 damage to the target creature or player.	NAME: Goblin Captain ELEMENT: Fire COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2|2 TEXT: :sacrifice one pillar, one tower or one pendulum to deal 4 damage to the target creature or player.

ART: I need two goblin images!!  IDEA: Crystalmaker NOTES: I think this card like a final game card, "opponent has 20 hp, so i sacrificate my 7 pillars (unupped card) to deal 21 damage SERIES: none

[Ajit]

I like it I suppose.  But the card could be re-worded I believe.  Also, did you actually draw those goblins?  Very cool if you did!

...although, if you just cropped them out of another picture, you can't say you did the art.

[ChAiNeR87]

good card

[ZephyrPhantom]

Good concept.  Is that really your art though? If not, credit the original artist for the unedited art, then say you edited it.

Capitalize plz, the curators can be picky when looking at cards.

[OldTrees]

Good card to pioneer the field of sacrificing pillars.

Googling 'public domain' art, making your own in paint or requesting some politely from the amazing artists in our community are all acceptable alternatives.

[SpikeSpiegel]

Like I said in the multilingual section, I like this card...but:

- IMO 4 damage are too much...for unupped one...3 dmg maybe are better...
- I would have allowed unupped one to use pendulums too...
- Ability cost in another element (i like synergies...), maybe... ?

[joebob777]

i dont really think 4 damage is too much when it comes to giving up a pillar, pillars are one of the most basic functions of this game and are needed in 99% of decks

[crystalmakwer]

I have modified the unupped card with 2 spikespiegel ideas but i want that this card remain only a fire card because i think now there are too many powerful rainbow decks and mono decks can't compete.
I have remove google images, so i need 2 goblin arts 

i dont really think 4 damage is too much when it comes to giving up a pillar, pillars are one of the most basic functions of this game and are needed in 99% of decks

I think it so! Using the ability too early is risky, so this is a card for the end game!

[Valcero]

Nice card, I like the concept of sacrificing pillars instead of quanta to use special abilities.
That being said, I think 3 damage is a bit too much, I'd personally go with 2.

Pillars are usually plentiful, so it's not like your sacrificing a major card.

[SpikeSpiegel]

i dont really think 4 damage is too much when it comes to giving up a pillar, pillars are one of the most basic functions of this game and are needed in 99% of decks

Pillars/Towers aren't so important for a fire deck, have you ever heard about cremation/immolation?

[joebob777]

i dont really think 4 damage is too much when it comes to giving up a pillar, pillars are one of the most basic functions of this game and are needed in 99% of decks

Pillars/Towers aren't so important for a fire deck, have you ever heard about cremation/immolation?

yes i have and that is why i said 99% not all decks, i'll gladly change to 95% but i see cremation invalid to this card as it makes it useless besides cremation fodder

[Kuroaitou]

CURATOR COMMENT
-Capitalize 'Sacrifice' in both your card image and in the TEXT section of the table
-Please provide a source of artwork when you can

The only problem I see with this card is that in the NOTES section, being able to pump out 21 damage in a turn (by using the Goblin's ability) isn't translated on the card; there's no mention that it can be repeatedly used, which I feel that you should add somewhere. Other than that though, it's an okay CC card for with a mechanic that gives Burning Pillars a new use...