Failsafe | Failsafe

[skyironsword]

Your HP will be kept at one, I guess.

And of course it's a win in any case. So is killing your opponent, right? This is just a more defensive way of winning in any case. Basically, it will win if you can continuously play it. Due to that being too easy right now, I'm probably going to change that to "Shuffle into deck"

[timetock]

even shuffle back to deck is a problem - what if you put 3 copies into the deck, have 6 sundials, couple of novas with upped EA, protect your pillars. Wait for them to deck out. And it's "failsafe".

[skyironsword]

... what if you replace all those EA and Failsafes with light dragons...

[iskelion]

Your HP will be kept at one, I guess.

And of course it's a win in any case. So is killing your opponent, right? This is just a more defensive way of winning in any case. Basically, it will win if you can continuously play it. Due to that being too easy right now, I'm probably going to change that to "Shuffle into deck"

it will still be OP, having you can put multiple of this in your deck, and having in mind you can end up with all the remaining cards in your deck being this one. in any case, is too powerful my later suggestion remains, if you added a "discard a card or this card has no effect", this card would be balanced and perfectly playable (and maybe even decrese its cost by  or so)