Could probably reduce the cost a bit (weapons are always undercost a bit) espcially since it prevents you from using a shield. Still might have limited uses since earth already has a weapon that can destroy things and you can still have a shield with it, its cheaper and you can destroy other things. And rush can use longsword/gavel. But interesting
Okay, thanks. Yeah, I had a slight feeling that it might have been too expensive. Is 4
a better cost? And yes, this one is, in the long run, inferior to Pulverizer. It has an advantage immediately out the door because it does not rely on a duo element for its ability.
The other reason for the "no shield" feature is that I plan to include this in an "annoyer" set built around the Gift | Gift (
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,30838.0.html) card (where every card has a certain double-edged effect that can be put to very effective use against unprepared opponents). For example, this card would be extremely harmful to decks which rely on Bonewall, Dim Shields, Wings, etc., since you can build up potential damage and bounce their shield by gifting this card.