Fusion | Improved Fusion

[OldTrees]

Is the destruction of the upped card immediate or does it check only right before generating quanta?
If the latter then the text can be cleaned up to read:
"Each turn  is generated. Absorb  per turn."

Unupped could be simplified if you change the "Absorb  per turn" to "Absorb  per turn".

1. The destruction of the upped card was before generating quanta immediately. Thanks for asking ^^,
2. A more simplified word for upped was amazing. I'll change the card note for upped later.
3. For the unupped one i still with the  , because if absorbing  , it'll speedup the destruction. The reason of choosing  is to reduce the speed of the destruction of the card, while absorbing  are possible (around 8,3%). Thanks for asking.

EDIT: for number one.

1&2) Absorb is not immediate but would be the simpler effect.
3) I doubt anyone playing this card would ever let it be destroyed by not supplying  . Absorb 2 quanta or Absorb  seem better options.
Note: " " only symbolizes 1 random quanta on the forums. "1 quanta" is the correct syntax on a card.

[lolicjj]

Is the destruction of the upped card immediate or does it check only right before generating quanta?
If the latter then the text can be cleaned up to read:
"Each turn  is generated. Absorb  per turn."

Unupped could be simplified if you change the "Absorb  per turn" to "Absorb  per turn".

1. The destruction of the upped card was before generating quanta immediately. Thanks for asking ^^,
2. A more simplified word for upped was amazing. I'll change the card note for upped later.
3. For the unupped one i still with the  , because if absorbing  , it'll speedup the destruction. The reason of choosing  is to reduce the speed of the destruction of the card, while absorbing  are possible (around 8,3%). Thanks for asking.

EDIT: for number one.

1&2) Absorb is not immediate but would be the simpler effect.
3) I doubt anyone playing this card would ever let it be destroyed by not supplying  . Absorb 2 quanta or Absorb  seem better options.
Note: " " only symbolizes 1 random quanta on the forums. "1 quanta" is the correct syntax on a card.

1&2.Sorry, but what does it means?
3. Now i know what you mean. I'll note this.
*Note. My apologizes to be the noobs on creating cads. Thanks for the information.

+Karma for OldTrees and Nepycros for help me this far ^^,

[OldTrees]

Is the destruction of the upped card immediate or does it check only right before generating quanta?
If the latter then the text can be cleaned up to read:
"Each turn  is generated. Absorb  per turn."

Unupped could be simplified if you change the "Absorb  per turn" to "Absorb  per turn".

1. The destruction of the upped card was before generating quanta immediately. Thanks for asking ^^,
2. A more simplified word for upped was amazing. I'll change the card note for upped later.
3. For the unupped one i still with the  , because if absorbing  , it'll speedup the destruction. The reason of choosing  is to reduce the speed of the destruction of the card, while absorbing  are possible (around 8,3%). Thanks for asking.

EDIT: for number one.

1&2) Absorb is not immediate but would be the simpler effect.
3) I doubt anyone playing this card would ever let it be destroyed by not supplying  . Absorb 2 quanta or Absorb  seem better options.
Note: " " only symbolizes 1 random quanta on the forums. "1 quanta" is the correct syntax on a card.

1&2.Sorry, but what does it means?
3. Now i know what you mean. I'll note this.
*Note. My apologizes to be the noobs on creating cads. Thanks for the information.

+Karma for OldTrees and Nepycros for help me this far ^^,

Example1: I have 1 , I cast Lightning, I play a Aether Tower
Example2: A Devouerer drains my last at the end of my opponent's turn. I play a Aether Tower on my turn.
In these examples reaches 0 for a brief moment.

There are two options:
Immediate: The above example would destroy the card. However this requires code that constantly checks the quanta levels in between every action. This would have fast clicking bugs as a consequence and take more code than option 2.
Absorb: The above example would not destroy the card because Absorb only checks once per turn (on that slot's time in the turn order either before or after the end of the turn triggered abilities of that slot.) Absorb has not fast clicking bugs and takes less code than option 1.

[lolicjj]

Is the destruction of the upped card immediate or does it check only right before generating quanta?
If the latter then the text can be cleaned up to read:
"Each turn  is generated. Absorb  per turn."

Unupped could be simplified if you change the "Absorb  per turn" to "Absorb  per turn".

1. The destruction of the upped card was before generating quanta immediately. Thanks for asking ^^,
2. A more simplified word for upped was amazing. I'll change the card note for upped later.
3. For the unupped one i still with the  , because if absorbing  , it'll speedup the destruction. The reason of choosing  is to reduce the speed of the destruction of the card, while absorbing  are possible (around 8,3%). Thanks for asking.

EDIT: for number one.

1&2) Absorb is not immediate but would be the simpler effect.
3) I doubt anyone playing this card would ever let it be destroyed by not supplying  . Absorb 2 quanta or Absorb  seem better options.
Note: " " only symbolizes 1 random quanta on the forums. "1 quanta" is the correct syntax on a card.

1&2.Sorry, but what does it means?
3. Now i know what you mean. I'll note this.
*Note. My apologizes to be the noobs on creating cads. Thanks for the information.

+Karma for OldTrees and Nepycros for help me this far ^^,

Example1: I have 1 , I cast Lightning, I play a Aether Tower
Example2: A Devouerer drains my last at the end of my opponent's turn. I play a Aether Tower on my turn.
In these examples reaches 0 for a brief moment.

There are two options:
Immediate: The above example would destroy the card. However this requires code that constantly checks the quanta levels in between every action. This would have fast clicking bugs as a consequence and take more code than option 2.
Absorb: The above example would not destroy the card because Absorb only checks once per turn (on that slot's time in the turn order either before or after the end of the turn triggered abilities of that slot.) Absorb has not fast clicking bugs and takes less code than option 1.

For that thing i choose Absorb (sorry to make you a bit confuse before ) so it won't make other worried about the card too much.

[lolicjj]

*POLL CLOSED*

I'll edit the card very very soon. Thank you for your vote.

[OldTrees]

Absorb not Abosrb

[lolicjj]

Absorb not Abosrb

Gosh. So many mistakes i've done for this time But thank you for reminding me