Sunset | Midday sun

[stewie]

Here is the idea of a defense card against  an  , similar as Nightfall but for light and air creatures.
The idea is that on sunrise (unupgraded) the light afects directly to  an  harming his vision so they probability attack is reduced. And  creatures are charged with sun energy so they attack is +1 in the sunrise.
Otherwise, in midday sun (upgraded)  and creatures are not so dammaged for light, and they probability attacks i reduced but not so much as in the sunrise. But  :airand have more effects in midday sun, they attack is still +1 but his life is +1 too because of the energy of the sun.

What you think? People would have to thing if uppgrade or not, but, just works against  and  !

[Filly678]

Really, air?

[mildlyfrightenedboy]

A few notes:

You might want to change the name of the thread to "Sunrise | Midday sun" to match your card.
All creature stats are in the format of "# | #", but stat changes are in the format of "+#/+#" (see Blessing).  (The 'plus' signs may be substituted for 'minus' signs.)  (Direct) stat changes are always positive, so a stat reduction would read "gains -#/-#".  However, I see you are dealing with percentages, so I am not sure how it would work.  I am also not sure what you mean by "damage probability", so here are a few examples of how I believe the card text should read for the unupgraded version.
If you mean to say that and creatures lose 80% of their ATK power, the card would read:
"All and creatures' ATK is reduced by 80%.  All and creatures gain +1/+0."
If you mean to say that and creatures have an 80% chance of missing their attacks, the card would read:
"The attacks of all and creatures have an 80% chance to miss.  All and creatures gain +1/+0."

Although I have little to no idea what the card is supposed to do, it is rather clear that the card is overpowered.
You also need to follow the format for a card idea found here:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5039.0.html

[ZephyrPhantom]

Please use the proper format. (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5039.0.html)

This card (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8807.0.html) is similar but has done it better, IMHO.

Cards that specifically work against one element are pretty situational for the most part - the 80% miss rate for 5 quantum is overpowered even for just two elements - at most you can have 50% for a 6 quantum cost (Dusk Mantle), so the miss rate should probably be lowered to 40% if you intend to keep the effects.
 
I don't like this card very much as it's essentially a combination of Dusk Mantle and Eclipse for , and thus very unoriginal.  IMHO, you should find a more unique effect for this card.

Just my 2 cents.

[stewie]

A few notes:

You might want to change the name of the thread to "Sunrise | Midday sun" to match your card.
All creature stats are in the format of "# | #", but stat changes are in the format of "+#/+#" (see Blessing).  (The 'plus' signs may be substituted for 'minus' signs.)  (Direct) stat changes are always positive, so a stat reduction would read "gains -#/-#".  However, I see you are dealing with percentages, so I am not sure how it would work.  I am also not sure what you mean by "damage probability", so here are a few examples of how I believe the card text should read for the unupgraded version.
If you mean to say that and creatures lose 80% of their ATK power, the card would read:
"All and creatures' ATK is reduced by 80%.  All and creatures gain +1/+0."
If you mean to say that and creatures have an 80% chance of missing their attacks, the card would read:
"The attacks of all and creatures have an 80% chance to miss.  All and creatures gain +1/+0."

Although I have little to no idea what the card is supposed to do, it is rather clear that the card is overpowered.
You also need to follow the format for a card idea found here:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,5039.0.html

Yes I mean "The attacks of all and creatures have an 80% chance to miss.  All and creatures gain +1/+0."
Sorry, I'm bad in english...

[Nepycros]

I don't really like something that for only 4 quanta causes an 80% chance to miss, when Dusk only does 50% for 4 .

OP!

[mildlyfrightenedboy]

I don't really like something that for only 4 quanta causes an 80% chance to miss, when Dusk only does 50% for 4 .

OP!

Well, the 80% miss rate only applies to and creatures, so it might be balanced, just ridiculously situational.  How are you going to win with this?  A Skydive deck against a death-effect deck, or some other strange / deck?  It wouldn't even work against a Pestal deck. 

[nerd1]

you might want to format this better, here is a link to a card formatter:
http://xenocidius.webs.com/postgenerator/creatorbeta.htm (http://xenocidius.webs.com/postgenerator/creatorbeta.htm)
also, in a war match, this plus protect weapon/artifact would be much to OP, so I would reccoment giving it a passive ability that prevents it from becoming immaterial, like saying "This card is Tangible."

[stewie]

Hm, yes this card is little stupid maybe haha. Just forget it, i have post 2 others that I think are more plausible.