Force discard spell

[assassim]

4 gravity

choose to discard 1 card from your opponents hand (you never get to see their hand anyways so it would be kinda random but it gives you some control

upgraded: 3 gravity

Like my other idea the I haven't thought of the cards name yet

[Demagog]

It wouldn't be reliable enough. Nor practical. You're basically giving up one of your own cards to hope you get rid of a card your opponent needs. You'd be better off with a card your deck depends on.

[assassim]

It wouldn't be reliable enough. Nor practical. You're basically giving up one of your own cards to hope you get rid of a card your opponent needs. You'd be better off with a card your deck depends on.

oh but thats where wrong, this is like a deflag b4 they even play the card. lets say ur fightin a firebolt deck, you practically know that hes savin the bolts for later, this card can save u from those situations.
 eg.Miracle

[bobcamel]

That's why it's too strong. Hand and deck are safe zones.

[assassim]

this card would not be considred OP, the card your discarding, is just your best guess, you could be wasting 4 gravity on destroying one pillar. Also i guess the cost can be upped to 5/4

[Avenger]

It would be fun if it is the next card. Rewind massive dragon, discard. Never to see again. It is not OP, but it is fun.

[Demagog]

I guarantee you it would be worse than you think. Of course you'll disagree, but since the chances of this becoming a card are so low, looks like we'll never know for sure.

[Kamietsu]

I guarantee you it would be worse than you think. Of course you'll disagree, but since the chances of this becoming a card are so low, looks like we'll never know for sure.

I definitely disagree with that. especially if the FG's got them. They could potentially end up discarding your entire hand in just a few turns.

EDIT: Fixed my post. I meant disagree, NOT agree.

[Delreich]

Demagog is saying that it's weak, not too strong. I'm inclined to agree. We have lots of weak cards though, so...

[Demagog]

Ya we do have many weak cards. Weak cards aren't bad though. They can add variety. But weak cards are only a good thing when you have A LOT of cards to choose from. With the way this game is right now, and its design, weak cards are rarely used. Once there are a lot of cards, and the weak ones give certain strategic advantages or are necessary for strong cards to work effectively, then they become a good thing.

[bobcamel]

But what hell

You can remove a card from play even BEFORE THE FLOCKING ENEMY PLAYS IT.

This should not be possible.

[Daxx]

This should not be possible.

Why not? It's actually a staple of other card games, and technically the contents of an opponents hand not only determine the play-state, but the play-state can influence what cards you play and what cards you hold back. In fact, this would have a number of tactical uses (of course, it would force people to think).