Sulfurlous Balloon | Sulfurlous Balloon

[dramore]

Sulfurlous Balloon | Sulfurlous Balloon

NAME: Sulfurlous Balloon ELEMENT: Fire COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6|1 ABILITY: Upon death deal controller 5 damage and all of controller's creatures 3 damage. (Airborne.)	NAME: Sulfurlous Balloon ELEMENT: Fire COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 8|1 ABILITY: Upon death deal controller 5 damage and all of controller's creatures 3 damage. (Airborne.)

ART: IDEA: Dramore NOTES: This little guy should be pretty simple. He's cheap to play does fair damage but he has a hidden(sort of) cost. By that I mean the 5 damage you take when he dies.Also your creatures that are out of element(non-fire) take 3 damage too. For a Full fire deck this little guy can be a good rusher. Altho I think it would be best in some combo decks. Any way please review and leave your thoughts on it. One last note. It flys. Why you ask? Because it's like a hot air balloon full of sulfurlous gas which will flare very hot very fast. SERIES: ***Insert series name and link to series page (if any)***

Sulfurlous Balloon | Sulfurlous Balloon

NAME: Sulfurlous Balloon ELEMENT: Fire COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3|1 ABILITY: Upon destruction deal 5 damage to controller and all of controller's non-fire creatures.(Airborne)	NAME: Sulfurlous Balloon ELEMENT: Fire COST: 1 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3|1 ABILITY: Upon destruction deal 5 damage to controller and all of controller's non-fire creatures.(Airborne)

ART: IDEA: Dramore NOTES: This little guy should be pretty simple. He's cheap to play does fair damage but he has a hidden(sort of) cost. By that I mean the 5 damage you take when he dies. For a Full fire deck this little guy can be a good rusher. Altho I think it would be best in some combo decks. Any way please review and leave your thoughts on it. SERIES: ***Insert series name and link to series page (if any)***

[Wizardcat]

My first impulse would be to Nightmare it with a Fire Shield up. S'interesting.

The ATK|HP on the upped form is different in the table and card, by the way. Also: controller has two l's.

[dramore]

My first impulse would be to Nightmare it with a Fire Shield up. S'interesting.

The ATK|HP on the upped form is different in the table and card, by the way. Also: controller has two l's.

ty will fix

[OldTrees]

Vanilla Creatures with X|5 stats (X varies between creatures) tend to have a Cost of X quanta when unupped.

So a 3|5 creature would be worth 3 . (although it would not be a Fire creature because Fire has high attack low hp usually)

The backlash effect would need to be balanced with above average stats.
It probably should remain brittle so that the effect occurs more often.

Suggestion (mostly guesswork)
Casting Cost: 4 |3
Attack: 6|7
HP: 1
Effect: When destroyed deal controller 5 damage and all of controller's creature take 2 damage.

Notes on suggestion:
I increased the cost so it would not compete with Ash Eater
I increase the Attack to be worthy of the drawback
I simplified the drawback and decreased the severity
I do not know if my suggestion is balanced but it appears to be closer to balanced and fit the idea better for ETG.

[dramore]

Vanilla Creatures with X|5 stats (X varies between creatures) tend to have a Cost of X quanta when unupped.

So a 3|5 creature would be worth 3 . (although it would not be a Fire creature because Fire has high attack low hp usually)

The backlash effect would need to be balanced with above average stats.
It probably should remain brittle so that the effect occurs more often.

Suggestion (mostly guesswork)
Casting Cost: 4 |3
Attack: 6|7
HP: 1
Effect: When destroyed deal controller 5 damage and all of controller's creature take 2 damage.

Notes on suggestion:
I increased the cost so it would not compete with Ash Eater
I increase the Attack to be worthy of the drawback
I simplified the drawback and decreased the severity
I do not know if my suggestion is balanced but it appears to be closer to balanced and fit the idea better for ETG.

Thank you Old Trees. All I can say is I'll make some changes as soon as I get another chance to be online. I hoped to keep the quanta  based to make it better able to combo . How ever that may not be as good of an idea as I'd thought.

[OldTrees]

3 would be a better price upgraded because it is samll enough to be able to dip with a mark or a Supernova or Immolation speedbow.
Increasing the attack by 1 and droping the cost from 3 to 3 is probably too much.

Maintaining the "non fire" aspect of the card is unnecessarily complex and realistic. ETG is by its nature a relatively abstract game. If Fire creatures can be harmed by Fire shield they should be harmed by the Balloon.

[dramore]

changes made please review