Epoch Force | Aeon Force

[Ginyu]

Sundial doesn't affect weapons as well. ^^

[OdinVanguard]

Bonewall, phase shield, dissipation shield, wings, and procrastination shields would stop them dead in their tracks.

Procrastionation doesn't affect weapons.

The effect does not replace the weapon's ability.

Well, the only problem is Vampire dagger. Darkness can use Steal to get rid of annoying shields (usually decks don't run lots of shields) and then damage and healing stack really fast. It is vulnerable to PC, yes, but still... this would need a slight cost increase, however other weapons wouldn't benefit that much.

*face palm* doh! been playing oEtG too long... forgot about that thanks for pointing it out.

ah vampire dagger... bane of many weapon boost ideas.... lol.

Okay, the steal is definitely a pain there and being in element with the weapon that is also causing problems doesn't help either.

So I'll go with bumping the cost by 1 on both.

Sundial doesn't affect weapons as well. ^^

Yes, that one I did remember (which is why its not noted as an interaction)... although that might be a good idea as an exception. I.e. have dials disrupt the effect. Then time could have a nice counter (and steal wouldn't help).

[ddevans96]

...

I'm stupid today, forgive me.

[OdinVanguard]

Okay, I have updated the card post.
I tweaked the wording a bit so hopefully it applies a little more broadly.

I also updated the OP to note that both sundial and Shard of Patience (if on the same side as this card) will disrupt the effect.

Hopefully that gives a broad range of disrupting effects. The SoPa interaction may not be a direct counter, but it will make wielders of this card think twice before stealing it. They will have to weigh which effect would be more useful, this one, or SoPa.

[Blacksmith]

I like the idea, it'svery interesting.HOwever I think the upped versionis slightely op. Un upped seems good though. I also like the art!

[OdinVanguard]

hmm... ya, upped is tricky to balance. I want it to give more punch to keep pace with accel vs overdrive... do you think bumping the cost a little more would be good for the upped?
It would give a bit of an acid-trip syndrome that way... upped is meant for a focused raw power approach but less splashable (and thus less utilitarian) whereas unupped gives less punch per card but can be splashed.
Or should I flip them at that point and make the unupped very expensive but higher power while the upped is splashable but lower power per card... Input here is nice since some players tend to like it the first way and others might want it the second way.

[Sorathor]

The upgrade is still too pricey IMO.

If you do the Math, the unupped version attacks for(x+1)/2 on average, where X is the number of consecutive hits.
E.G if you manage to make 5 consecutive attacks, your attack increased for 3 average. So you could have played a 3 Atk ccreature for same amount of Dmg.
For 2  quite balanced.

If compared with arsenic you have -2 base dmg and the easier to prevent dmg, but you can stack it, so it seems fair to me.

The upped version attacks for x+1 on average, so if you manage to hit twice you alerady have reached the point, where average dmg and  spent ae equal.
Also if you manage to hit 5 consecutive turns, thats 30 Dmg per Aeon. Take 2 of these  + Titan and do 100 dmg in 5 turns. + 3 PA is a 5 turn win for 6 5 3 . Only counter being SoSac and screwed draws.

Overdrive is much more vulnerable since quint s more expensive + you weaken your creatures yourself.

[Blacksmith]

hmm... ya, upped is tricky to balance. I want it to give more punch to keep pace with accel vs overdrive... do you think bumping the cost a little more would be good for the upped?
It would give a bit of an acid-trip syndrome that way... upped is meant for a focused raw power approach but less splashable (and thus less utilitarian) whereas unupped gives less punch per card but can be splashed.
Or should I flip them at that point and make the unupped very expensive but higher power while the upped is splashable but lower power per card... Input here is nice since some players tend to like it the first way and others might want it the second way.

HOw about changeing upped to this?

Adds +1 to your weapon's damage for each sucessfull attack. Resets if weapon is lost or fails or loses an attack.( so all your weapon gains +1 for each sucessfull attack of all weapons and reseats if this particular one fails. So if you have 3 weapons and one fails all your weapons will gain +2 attack, but if it was this weapon which didn't do any damage all buffs will be resteted.

[Treldon]

HOw about changeing upped to this?

Adds +1 to your weapon's damage for each sucessfull attack. Resets if weapon is lost or fails or loses an attack.( so all your weapon gains +1 for each sucessfull attack of all weapons and reseats if this particular one fails. So if you have 3 weapons and one fails all your weapons will gain +2 attack, but if it was this weapon which didn't do any damage all buffs will be resteted.

Only your equipped weapon is affected by this. Flown weapons and crusaders will not benefit from it.

[Blacksmith]

HOw about changeing upped to this?

Adds +1 to your weapon's damage for each sucessfull attack. Resets if weapon is lost or fails or loses an attack.( so all your weapon gains +1 for each sucessfull attack of all weapons and reseats if this particular one fails. So if you have 3 weapons and one fails all your weapons will gain +2 attack, but if it was this weapon which didn't do any damage all buffs will be resteted.

Only your equipped weapon is affected by this. Flown weapons and crusaders will not benefit from it.

YUp^^
My idea was to change that on the upped version to make it a bit mroe versatile.