Vampire Shield | Vampire Aegis

[Thalas]

NAME: Vampire Shield ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 5 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Shield: Drains Hp from your creatures and adds it to your own Hp, if you lose hp. Creatures can't be killed.	NAME: Vampire Aegis ELEMENT: Darkness COST: 3 TYPE: Permanent ATK|HP: TEXT: Shield: Drains Hp from your creatures and adds it to your own Hp, if you lose hp. Creatures can't be killed.

ART: Thalas (me) made in spore IDEA: Thalas and LongDono( Steal my idea) NOTES: Example You have 100 HP, and a 5/24 Gargoyle on the field and Opponent has got 8/3 Shireker. opponent's shrieker attacks and you lose 8 HP. The vampire shield drains from 8 Hp from your Gargoyle, you gain 8 HP You have 100 Hp and the 5/16 Gargoyle Vampire shield shield doesn't reduce the max health so the drained creatures can be healed. Creatures can't be killed by Vampire shield. If your creatures don't have Hp nothing happens. Voodoo : if this creature survives attack, damage and status is inflicted to the oppponent as well. The drain isn't attack so Voodoo dolls wouldn't inflict damage to opponent SERIES:

[918273645]

/ duo!

[Nepycros]

Voodoo Doll + Fractal breaks this card once more.

Not to mention an army of Archangels.

[Thalas]

Gargoyles and angels.

Edit : I forgotten the voodoo dolls.   
But if the voodoo dolls would be nerfed, vampire shield wouldn't be overpowered and the voodoo doll would be used more.

[Nepycros]

So, for this card to become balanced, another card has to be nerfed. Not sure I enjoy that. Let's toss a few ideas around and work on a solution. The main problem is Voodoo Doll. The effect is every time it survives an attack, it deals it back to the opponent. Does this shield count as doing direct damage, or indirect?

[Thalas]

So, for this card to become balanced, another card has to be nerfed. Not sure I enjoy that. Let's toss a few ideas around and work on a solution. The main problem is Voodoo Doll. The effect is every time it survives an attack, it deals it back to the opponent. Does this shield count as doing direct damage, or indirect?

It's direct damage but the voodoo problem has a better solution.

Voodoo : if this creature survives attack, damage and status is inflicted to the oppponent as well.

The drain isn't attack so Voodoo dolls wouldn't inflict damage to opponent

[Nepycros]

Infection isn't an attack, it isn't even direct damage, but poison status still applies to the opponent.

[Thalas]

Infection isn't an attack, it isn't even direct damage, but poison status still applies to the opponent.

Infection is status, but the drain isn't.

[Nepycros]

This shield effectively works like the spell Siphon Life. I've got an idea. Creatures that lose more than 5 health become lobotomized, to prevent massive damage to the opponent. Sort of a price to pay for hurting your own creatures, you jerk. XD JK.

[Thalas]

This shield effectively works like the spell Siphon Life. I've got an idea. Creatures that lose more than 5 health become lobotomized, to prevent massive damage to the opponent. Sort of a price to pay for hurting your own creatures, you jerk. XD JK.

I think that the problem with the voodoo dolls is solved, but if you still think that the Shield is OP, I make it, that Vampire Shield reduce the max Hp, but before that I want to know other poeple think about this card

[joebob777]

 ok keeping the Vampire skill up, i would change it to:
Shield: Blocks 1/2 damage, all creatures with no ability gain the passive ability Vampire
PS: 100th post yaaaaay . . . dont ruin my fun just because you all have posted more times then me

[AnonymousRevival]

You might want to specifically say how much HP has been drained in the card itself.