Twin Carnivores | Twin Carnivores

[Rutarete]

NAME: Twin Carnivores ELEMENT: Other COST: 4 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 2/2 TEXT: This creature comes into play with its twin.	NAME: Twin Carnivore ELEMENT: Other COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 3/3 TEXT: This creature comes into play with its twin.

ART: requesting IDEA: Rutarete NOTES: This would be treated as one creature for most targeting purposes, but they can be buffed separately. Note that this is in a sense the same thing as an other creature for 4 with stats 4/4 | 6/6. It's merely split in half. I have a feeling the cost isn't quite balanced yet. I'm not sure if i'll make a Big Creature or maybe a Two for One series, focusing on taking up certain amounts of spaces to play creatures on the board. One way to describe this card: "United they stand, united they fall". If you have a suggestion for a better name, please let me know SERIES:

[ZephyrPhantom]

I like the concept, it's an interesting method of balance since smaller attacks are weaker to shields.

Was this inspired by Alpha Wolf (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,4195.0.html), by any chance?

[Rutarete]

It didn't come from alpha wolf. This was one of those that randomly pops into your head.
EDit: Also, do you think this would work for the passive comp.?

[ZephyrPhantom]

It didn't come from alpha wolf. This was one of those that randomly pops into your head.
EDit: Also, do you think this would work for the passive comp.?

I don't think so, considering that Graboid's auto-burrow isn't considered a passive and Immortal's immaterial is an active ability.

[Anarook]

With a considerable redesign it could go into passives.
Perhaps a creature with a kind of synchronize ability.
~Every creature of the same name is treated as one creature.

Targeted with a buff => they all get buffed.
Targeted with damage => they all get damaged.

Though I probably shoulda kept that to myself.
Though I can still make use of it, mwahaha(pardon the self rambling)

[artimies7]

Would this affect the bazaar? I mean, would I have 3 or 6 of these in my deck, individually, because they are, in most cases, treated as one creature.

Another note: For the passive competition, you might have a spell card that gives the passive ability 'Twin'.
Twin: Link two creatures on your field. Both are affected equally.
They would be buffed, damaged, and die together, no matter what their stats. Essenially, you would be able to buff twice your creatures for the same cost at the risk of being twice as vulnerable to CC.

If you don't want it, I'll take it.

[Rutarete]

Would this affect the bazaar? I mean, would I have 3 or 6 of these in my deck, individually, because they are, in most cases, treated as one creature.

Another note: For the passive competition, you might have a spell card that gives the passive ability 'Twin'.
Twin: Link two creatures on your field. Both are affected equally.
They would be buffed, damaged, and die together, no matter what their stats. Essenially, you would be able to buff twice your creatures for the same cost at the risk of being twice as vulnerable to CC.

If you don't want it, I'll take it.

You'd have 6 of these in your deck. When on the field, instead of 6 'normal' creatures, you have 6 pairs of creatures with halved stats.
You can take your idea; i'll think of something else.

[Anarook]

Would this affect the bazaar? I mean, would I have 3 or 6 of these in my deck, individually, because they are, in most cases, treated as one creature.

Another note: For the passive competition, you might have a spell card that gives the passive ability 'Twin'.
Twin: Link two creatures on your field. Both are affected equally.
They would be buffed, damaged, and die together, no matter what their stats. Essenially, you would be able to buff twice your creatures for the same cost at the risk of being twice as vulnerable to CC.

If you don't want it, I'll take it.

There's a card, maybe even more than one, in the Crucible that does just this.

[Rutarete]

Would this affect the bazaar? I mean, would I have 3 or 6 of these in my deck, individually, because they are, in most cases, treated as one creature.

Another note: For the passive competition, you might have a spell card that gives the passive ability 'Twin'.
Twin: Link two creatures on your field. Both are affected equally.
They would be buffed, damaged, and die together, no matter what their stats. Essenially, you would be able to buff twice your creatures for the same cost at the risk of being twice as vulnerable to CC.

If you don't want it, I'll take it.

There's a card, maybe even more than one, in the Crucible that does just this.

Are you referring to this?

Was this inspired by Alpha Wolf (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,4195.0.html), by any chance?

If it's not the one you're referring to, will you post the links here then?

[Anarook]

I was refering to the linked creature idea.
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,20711.0.html

[Rutarete]

I was refering to the linked creature idea.
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,20711.0.html

lol My own Synergy card.
I suppose i've made a lot of variations of linked ideas, perhaps i'll make a portfolio soon and gather them all up.
But i'll still go with this, because this is a creature variation.