Dimensional Shift | Dimensional Paradox

[Annele]

NAME: Dimensional Shift ELEMENT: Aether COST: 3 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP : TEXT: Deals 2 damage to target for every 10 you possess. Can target immortal creatures, but not your opponent.	NAME: Dimensional Paradox ELEMENT: Aether COST: 1 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP : TEXT: Deals 2 damage to target for every 10 you possess. Can target immortal creatures, but not your opponent.

ART: Modified Mark of Aether. If anyone can give it an effect like fire bolt's, on the tip, it would be appreciated. IDEA: mypetmachine NOTES: Aether's "bolt". Cannot target yourself as well. Small nerf to SoW. Cost is susceptible to change. This is part of the "bolt" series I am currently constructing. Any ideas for the other elements will be welcomed.  SERIES:

[tyranim]

we bringing back the omni-bolt ideas now? finally.
i do gatta say i dig the card. though i think the 1 cost on the upped version is upping it too much

[Calindu]

we bringing back the omni-bolt ideas now? finally.
i do gotta say i dig the card. though i think the 1 cost on the upped version is upping it too much

The cost is as same as Fire Bolt.
Also 3 damage/10 quanta or 2 damage/7 quanta please.

[Heavenscall]

Good idea that bolt. Cause aether is the typical untargetable nature... BTW i send you an idea for an another bolt, hope not a too bad one

[furballdn]

Can target immortals makes this better a bit, but the fact that it can't target the opponent weakens it a lot. Now, it's just some kind of anti-immortality for . Aether already has lightning, and you'd need at least 30 for it to be better than lightning.

[esran]

hates on immortality, and i feel theres no reason. immortality is already balanced IMO and it is sopposed to be immune to direct CC. other than that i feel like this kind of CC is something aether doesnt need, as it has that covered with lightning bolt, and its unfair to give an element so many forms of damage CC.

[Annele]

we bringing back the omni-bolt ideas now? finally.
i do gatta say i dig the card. though i think the 1 cost on the upped version is upping it too much

I'm glad you like it. Cost is just the base bolt cost, if there is enough agreement I will change it.

The cost is as same as Fire Bolt.
Also 3 damage/10 quanta or 2 damage/7 quanta please.

I'm afraid that it will overshadow lightning if I increase damage.

Can target immortals makes this better a bit, but the fact that it can't target the opponent weakens it a lot. Now, it's just some kind of anti-immortality for . Aether already has lightning, and you'd need at least 30 for it to be better than lightning.

Would it be more balanced if it could target opponent as well? This could fix it with Calindu as well.

[russianspy1234]

we bringing back the omni-bolt ideas now? finally.
i do gatta say i dig the card. though i think the 1 cost on the upped version is upping it too much

I'm glad you like it. Cost is just the base bolt cost, if there is enough agreement I will change it.

The cost is as same as Fire Bolt.
Also 3 damage/10 quanta or 2 damage/7 quanta please.

I'm afraid that it will overshadow lightning if I increase damage.

Can target immortals makes this better a bit, but the fact that it can't target the opponent weakens it a lot. Now, it's just some kind of anti-immortality for . Aether already has lightning, and you'd need at least 30 for it to be better than lightning.

Would it be more balanced if it could target opponent as well? This could fix it with Calindu as well.

if it could target opponent as well it would possibly bring back firestall as an FG killer...

[furballdn]

Why does aether need this card?

A sort of OTK to help stall? Aether already has dim shields.
A way to have CC? Aether has lightning, one of the most powerful CC cards available, and lobo and TU for softer CC.

[Drake_XIV]

What if it dealt more damage to Immaterial creatures?