Mythic Tiger | Mythic Tiger (Chinese Zodiac Series)

[twinsbuster]

Different from the Western one, the Chinese Zodiac cycle every 12 years.
There are 12 creatures representing different Zodiac. You can see the Oracle Diagram below.

Now it's the Year of Tiger.

The others are coming,
discuss!

NAME: Mythic Tiger ELEMENT: Fire COST: 8  TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 7|6 ABILITY: Sacrifice all other creatures you control at the end of every turn. : Dive	NAME: Mythic Tiger ELEMENT: Fire COST: 8  TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 8|7 ABILITY: Sacrifice all other creatures you control at the end of every turn. : Dive

ART: Chinese Zodiac Papercut Art source source (http://d.yimg.com/mv/nimage/f8b41fd97fb9b132) These are some Ancient Traditional forms of Art. They are common in some Chinese Calender and New Year Red Pocket. The sources are not the Art creaters. IDEA: twinsbuster NOTES: No more than one tiger can live in a mountain. SERIES: Traditional Chinese Zodiac Series

Previous Zodiac series by twinsbuster
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8964.0.html (http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,8964.0.html)

[guolin]

Huh, seems rather UP, especially since the attack:cost ratio of this "solo" creature isn't exactly high. (8 for 12/14, plus upkeep every turn) However, I like how your series is going so far - promoting duos.

[twinsbuster]

Huh, seems rather UP, especially since the attack:cost ratio of this "solo" creature isn't exactly high. (8 for 12/14, plus upkeep every turn) However, I like how your series is going so far - promoting duos.

because I also consider buff spell and destroying creature you owned maybe benefit with death element

[guolin]

Huh, seems rather UP, especially since the attack:cost ratio of this "solo" creature isn't exactly high. (8 for 12/14, plus upkeep every turn) However, I like how your series is going so far - promoting duos.

because I also consider buff spell and destroying creature you owned maybe benefit with death element

Both of those things would require a trio deck. :O

I say 1-2 less summoning cost and we're fine.

[PhantomFox]

I don't get the appeal behind this card.  A crimson dragon does the same amount of damage for only 2 more and no required.  And Fire really doesn't benefit from having its creatures die, especially in an uncontrolled manner such as this.  I'm confused to its purpose.

[twinsbuster]

I will consider to lower its cost, or raise the HP to 6…
but buff spell make the damage double, and the upped version is dealing 14 damage, which is different from the red dragon

[twinsbuster]

Now its status are improved to 7/6
and can be targeted by rage potion

I think it's enough to let it solo.