Crumbling Golem|Crumbling Colossus

[EvilDeathX]

its worth mentioning that you need to find new art for the card, just because someone uploaded a picture they liked to their photobucket account doesn't mean the copyright goes away.

also, take away the momentum portion of the card. it either takes away from gravity (if not a gravity card) or overlaps with charger (if a gravity card)

You have a valid point about the image, might you have anywhere to suggest. Also there is no Momentum anywhere on this card. Where do you see that?

[blarp]

its worth mentioning that you need to find new art for the card, just because someone uploaded a picture they liked to their photobucket account doesn't mean the copyright goes away.

also, take away the momentum portion of the card. it either takes away from gravity (if not a gravity card) or overlaps with charger (if a gravity card)

You have a valid point about the image, might you have anywhere to suggest. Also there is no Momentum anywhere on this card. Where do you see that?

I think he read unaffected by shards as unaffected by shields. Can't suggest a place for you to find art, other than from the community. Can look up open source golem artwork or something and maybe find something good.

[EvilDeathX]

its worth mentioning that you need to find new art for the card, just because someone uploaded a picture they liked to their photobucket account doesn't mean the copyright goes away.

also, take away the momentum portion of the card. it either takes away from gravity (if not a gravity card) or overlaps with charger (if a gravity card)

You have a valid point about the image, might you have anywhere to suggest. Also there is no Momentum anywhere on this card. Where do you see that?

I think he read unaffected by shards as unaffected by shields. Can't suggest a place for you to find art, other than from the community. Can look up open source golem artwork or something and maybe find something good.

That would make sense.

[moomoose]

yeah, misread shards as shields.

posts about acceptible places to find/make card art:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,34339.0.html
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16655.msg480642.html#msg480642

one final piece of advice- the crumbling mechanic is pretty good, but i would only submit one of the three (creature, shield, or weapon) to the crucible, as if you submit all 3, it will probably have an adverse effect on the voting results for them.  it is easy to see how the mechanic could be implemented into a variety of vessels, but the core idea of crumbling remains the same and that is likely what, if anything, will be 'inspiring' to zanz should he implement the idea in some form or fashion.  so basically my advise boils down to not watering down the mechanic by making it into a series of sorts.  zanz has shown that if he likes an idea enough, he can implement it in a variety of ways if he so chooses.

[OdinVanguard]

yeah, misread shards as shields.

posts about acceptible places to find/make card art:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,34339.0.html
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16655.msg480642.html#msg480642

one final piece of advice- the crumbling mechanic is pretty good, but i would only submit one of the three (creature, shield, or weapon) to the crucible, as if you submit all 3, it will probably have an adverse effect on the voting results for them.  it is easy to see how the mechanic could be implemented into a variety of vessels, but the core idea of crumbling remains the same and that is likely what, if anything, will be 'inspiring' to zanz should he implement the idea in some form or fashion.  so basically my advise boils down to not watering down the mechanic by making it into a series of sorts.  zanz has shown that if he likes an idea enough, he can implement it in a variety of ways if he so chooses.

Good advice... although, wouldn't submitting the series make it easier for the community to vote on which version of the implementation they like most

E.g. It gives the community the chance to give feedback (via, voting, etc.) on whether they like the mechanic better as a weapon, shield, or creature?

This can give an important avenue for discussion which would provide useful feedback for Zanz.

Alternatively, you could post what you feel is your best one, but supply links to the others, and a poll at the top to let players voice there opinion that way.

That would also help keep from overcluttering the crucible polls.

[blarp]

yeah, misread shards as shields.

posts about acceptible places to find/make card art:
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,34339.0.html
http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,16655.msg480642.html#msg480642

one final piece of advice- the crumbling mechanic is pretty good, but i would only submit one of the three (creature, shield, or weapon) to the crucible, as if you submit all 3, it will probably have an adverse effect on the voting results for them.  it is easy to see how the mechanic could be implemented into a variety of vessels, but the core idea of crumbling remains the same and that is likely what, if anything, will be 'inspiring' to zanz should he implement the idea in some form or fashion.  so basically my advise boils down to not watering down the mechanic by making it into a series of sorts.  zanz has shown that if he likes an idea enough, he can implement it in a variety of ways if he so chooses.

WHAT OTHER SECRETS DO YOU HAVE TO GET YOUR CARDS IN THE GAME MOOMOOSE?!
If I let you post all of my ideas will they make it into the game?

[blarp]

Bump!

Pretty sure this is considered spam by the way and frowned upon. Please discontinue this practice.