Crossing Zone | Crossing Trap

[waterzx]

NAME: Crossing Zone ELEMENT: Entropy COST: 2 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Opponent gains your weapon ( or shield ). In return, you gain opponent's shield ( or weapon ).	NAME: Crossing Trap ELEMENT: Entropy COST: 1 TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: TEXT: Opponent gains your equipped weapon (or shield). In return, you gain opponent's shield (or weapon).

ART: Modified from : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Campfire_and_sparks_in_Anttoora_1.jpg IDEA: Waterzx NOTES: In case you don't know what I mean, when you use this card, you can choose to give your opponent a weapon or shield. If you give out a weapon, you gain opponent's shield. If you give out a shield, you gain opponent's weapon. Uses : 1. Replace opponent's weapon or shield with a crap. For example, replaces the Eternity with a dagger 2. "Sacrifice" useless equipment. For example, give out a shield and gain opponent's Titan. More importantly, you can always give your opponent a 1-turn dimensional shield, and your opponent would lose his original shield and the weapon. SERIES:

[choongmyoung]

Suggestion: Weapon to weapon, Shield to shield.
Weapon-shield and vice versa don't seem to be ... what should I call it ... equivalent?

[OdinVanguard]

Interesting concept. If opponent has an immaterial weapon or shield, does it still get switched? What if yours is immaterial, can you still target it?
Other than that I think this is a pretty cool card... maybe we'll start seeing daggers and short sword get more use.

[waterzx]

Interesting concept. If opponent has an immaterial weapon or shield, does it still get switched? What if yours is immaterial, can you still target it?
Other than that I think this is a pretty cool card... maybe we'll start seeing daggers and short sword get more use.

Since I have left this game for some time, I forgot there are immaterial permanents.

In this case, I think you won't be able to target your immaterial shield or weapon, but the second phase of the effect (getting opponent's equipment ) does not involve targeting, so this card can help you take down opponent's immaterial permanent.

Suggestion: Weapon to weapon, Shield to shield.
Weapon-shield and vice versa don't seem to be ... what should I call it ... equivalent?

I don't think that would be a good idea. In your case of equivalent exchange, you always need a crappy equipment to make this card beneficial to yourself. In the current version, you can switch weapons / shields according your own needs with greater flexibility ( e.g. give your opponent a weapon while getting a dim. shield from him)

[Rutarete]

Interesting concept. If opponent has an immaterial weapon or shield, does it still get switched? What if yours is immaterial, can you still target it?
Other than that I think this is a pretty cool card... maybe we'll start seeing daggers and short sword get more use.

Building on ^, does it keep protected status if switched?

[Zaealix]

Q. How does this thematically fit  ?
The only theme I really see is some sort of equivlent exchange, like bartering or something, and is inherently lawful, not chaotic. As such, it seems more like a  card to me.

[Lneacx]

Reminds me of this: http://elementscommunity.org/forum/index.php/topic,37996