Cold Snap | Cold Wave

[Hazardus10]

Just a tiny picky 

In the text, it should be frozen, not freezed.

Freezed isn't a word.

This is also slightly OP, maybe make the chance 50% instead of 100%, it would justify the cost and also balance the card.

[GamerJL]

Just a tiny picky 

In the text, it should be frozen, not freezed.

Freezed isn't a word.

This is also slightly OP, maybe make the chance 50% instead of 100%, it would justify the cost and also balance the card.

its not OP,it affects both players and creature and creatures that are dmg(health is >5) they are not affected. SRY my english is not good(its not my first language)

[blarp]

Just because it affects both players doesn't make it not OP.

If I had a card that killed all cards in both players decks hand and field that weren't flying it'd be completely op. If you didn't center your deck around flying creatures and used it it'd be stupid.

No one using this card will have a bunch of weapons and high hp creatures in their deck.

[GamerJL]

Just because it affects both players doesn't make it not OP.

If I had a card that killed all cards in both players decks hand and field that weren't flying it'd be completely op. If you didn't center your deck around flying creatures and used it it'd be stupid.

No one using this card will have a bunch of weapons and high hp creatures in their deck.

its a good tactic card like pandemonium, depends on player's deck and strategy.
but freeze doesnt kill, only lasts 3 turns plus no damage is inflicted.
its like a delay card to keep players with no heal cards alive.

[blarp]

Yeah but it's just something to worry about. OP until proven otherwise

Maybe it'd be less OP if you didn't know that cards in your opponents hand were frozen?

[GamerJL]

Yeah but it's just something to worry about. OP until proven otherwise

Maybe it'd be less OP if you didn't know that cards in your opponents hand were frozen?

spell affects creatures/permanent in field. itll be much confusing if cards are freeze while they are still in your hand.
 8)

[blarp]

I think a card that just freezes all weapons would be more interesting.

The 5 hp creature thing is too situational, but not rare enough to justify the potential deck countering.

Maybe I'm exaggerating the 5 hp thing, as gravity shield kinda sucks and isn't used that much, but if I had a vote on gravity shield I'd vote that down.

[CuCN]

It's mentioned in the notes that this is also supposed to be used with Shockwave. However, it makes a mono air able to instakill any (targetable) creature that doesn't have exactly 5 hp.

[blarp]

It's mentioned in the notes that this is also supposed to be used with Shockwave. However, it makes a mono air able to instakill any (targetable) creature that doesn't have exactly 5 hp.

That's a good point. Monoair OP as is

[GamerJL]

It's mentioned in the notes that this is also supposed to be used with Shockwave. However, it makes a mono air able to instakill any (targetable) creature that doesn't have exactly 5 hp.

shockwave is limited to 6 cards = 6 insta kills.
there are still powerful >5 cards.
like phoenix, devourer, screecher and immaterials.
good feedbacks, should i increase it to >6?

[CuCN]

It's mentioned in the notes that this is also supposed to be used with Shockwave. However, it makes a mono air able to instakill any (targetable) creature that doesn't have exactly 5 hp.

shockwave is limited to 6 cards = 6 insta kills.
there are still powerful >5 cards.
like phoenix, devourer, screecher and immaterials.
good feedbacks, should i increase it to >6?

My point was that for the <5 hp creatures the shockwave alone would kill it.

[blarp]

increasing it to >6 just makes it more situational. higher cost cards are harder to make "good" than lower cost cards. if this was a 1-2 quanta cost that had a simple effect, it could be easily determined if it was OP, be harder to make situational, and wouldn't be limited to only decks that were significantly part air.