Chronos | Chronos

[EvaRia]

Meh.
I kind of think Time needs a good midrange attacker, so I put it at 6.
Regardless, you either need to pack rewinds or Eternities in your dekc to use the ability, and 3 for 2|2 is more than fair IMO.

[AnonymousRevival]

Time is a non-rush element, For example, eternity costs 6 but only does 4 damage, and Anbuis does 8 Ltime, but does only 5 damage, but your card says it requires 4 but does 4 and 6 damage upped, sounds a bit too rushy eh?

[EvaRia]

That's the point.
Time has absolutely no mid range attacker, and desperately needs one to not be restricted to rainbow decks.
I mean seriously, time needs at least one mid-range attacker.
I'm just providing it.

[AnonymousRevival]

But then it defies the properties of time, and it wouldn't be that unique anymore.

[EvaRia]

I still don't get what's so bad about it.
Time as of now has all of 2, that's right, TWO creatures with more than 3 attack.
Both cost all of 8+ quanta.
I think time REALLY deserves at least ONE mid-range attacker. It's not gonna be less unique cause of it, it can only make it better.
I don't see your argument ><.

[AnonymousRevival]

I'm not saying it is not balanced, I actually agree with you. However, if there is a creature like this, it will defy the properties of tht element. Time, because it is not rushy.

[ddevans96]

I'm not saying it is not balanced, I actually agree with you. However, if there is a creature like this, it will defy the properties of tht element. Time, because it is not rushy.

Aether isn't rushy either, but it has phase recluses, which has a great ratio.

And it can rush with a very well made deck, but that's not the point.