Breakable Creature | Humpty Dumpty

[karis]

NAME: Breakable Creature ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 5 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 6|30 TEXT: Fragile: Destroy this card when affected by shield.	NAME: Humpty Dumpty ELEMENT: Gravity COST: 3 TYPE: Creature ATK|HP: 4|25 TEXT: Fragile: Destroy this card when affected by shield.

ART: IDEA: Karis NOTES: 'affected by shield' mean any effect from your opponent shield.  hp-1 from fire,  dmg-x or blocked,  delay or even miss. have any one can help me about this card art and it cost....  i still hesitate what should i do about this card ability.   unactive skill or passive.  SERIES:

[Naesala]

Change the element. Gravity is known for not having problems with shield. I know your idea is probably to momentum this guy, but the fragile ability doesn't quite fit. Also: why does a fragile creature die from hitting a shield, as what about shields with miss rates (dusk, fog, dimensional) would they make your creature break and if so that really doesn't make sense. I would suggest changing to water element and having the creature act as if frozen at all times (still gets to attack, but gains the extra damage by use of catapult and can break by shockwave)

[karis]

it's only humpty dumpty is...  something that break after he stay on a wall....   i made his ability from his story...  and this is why it instant 'break' after hit a shield(or wall)  maybe about miss shield it will have some accident after attack and break?   

i thinking about a water creature that been frozen (or maybe i already made it) .  even my answer for that choice is 'no' but that's not mean your idea is not interesting.  it's only the thing you said don't fit 'humpty dumpty' 

btw...  what element should this card be if it's not 'gravity'?

[Naesala]

Humpty dumpty looks like an egg...maybe time? or life? I kinda get the wall=shield. But in that case make both cards be named humpty dumpty

[EmeraldTiger]

here is some info for this http://www.answers.com/topic/humpty-dumpty

[ndclub]

The more I think about it the more I like the idea. However the name is just awful, I suspect you wont be able to get much support without thinking of something a little more creative. Not much is coming to mind but even things like berzerker or assault troop would be more fitting.

[Rutarete]

I think this is UP because shields are such a huge part of the metagame and very common. More Attack, lower cost, and less hp would make me more inclined to use this.

[bogtro]

How about 6|30 with "If damaged, turns into an eggshell". Then,
"Eggshell (0|7): Put back together again: Turn this card into Humpty Dumpty".

[Naesala]

Why make the health so high if any damage breaks it, and for that matter, if its so breakable why have so high health?

[mildlyfrightenedboy]

Story-wise, this might be better as a permanent that makes any creature that loses Airborne die instantly.
Realism-wise, this is a great card.

[karis]

@Naesala
it's egg...  or maybe an egg.  i don't know why time fit it (cuz fate egg?)  but maybe life is good.  why don't i make it be humpty dumpty for both card...  i don't like to do that...   

@EmeraldTiger
thx

@ndclub
if you talking about it unupgraded name.  that's true...   i made this card by use 'humpty dumpty' theme.  so i only find something can fit it (but it's not that fit...) 

@Rutarete
i ever hesitate about it status...  but with more atk and less hp.   it will be incredible OP for me if it have momentum (even if i change it element into fire for more atk and less hp part)  so i think it be great like this...

@bogtro
king and all his men can't even do that...  how can i do it?  lol   

@MildlyFrightenedBoy
i think you should made a new card with that ability....   some think like a permanent named 'spike'  that deal dmg to an airborne creature that lose it.   

[Rutarete]

If not those suggestions, then how about making it only die by negative effect shields? Ex. Permafrost, thorn, fire wall, etc. and not be killed by Solar shield, mirror, etc.