Brash Summon | Reckless Summon

[Duplication]

NAME: Brash Summon ELEMENT: Other COST: 10 Quantum TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: N/A TEXT: Draw a card.  If its a creature, summon it ignoring  cost. It has no ability and 0/0 until the end of the turn.	NAME: Reckless Summon ELEMENT: Other COST: 8 Quantum TYPE: Spell ATK|HP: N/A TEXT: Draw a card.  If its a creature, summon it ignoring  cost. It has no ability and 0/0 until the end of the turn.

ART: Duplication IDEA: Duplication NOTES: If the Images dont appear, right click the red X on the blank image and click "Show Image." The text include the phrase "It has no ability" please ignore that, it's there because i had forgotten that every creature ignore thier ability on the first turn they are summoned. SERIES: N/A

[Chapuz]

Why not "Draw a card. If it is a creature, generates a copy of it in your field."

Wellcomer mindgate, rewind and eternity sinergies!

Wellcome high number of creatures decks!!!

[Duplication]

Why not "Draw a card. If it is a creature, generates a copy of it in your field."

Wellcomer mindgate, rewind and eternity sinergies!

Wellcome high number of creatures decks!!!

It would kind of cheap for that creature to be both summoned and still have a copy wouldnt it?

is my card a good concept though?

[powdergame99]

it might cost a bit much, since the only creature that actually takes 10 quanta to summon is a dragon, but otherwise, i think it's a good concept
\.

[Duplication]

it might cost a bit much, since the only creature that actually takes 10 quanta to summon is a dragon, but otherwise, i think it's a good concept
\.

The reason the cost is so high, it so prevent someone from summoning a complete dragon deck without spending hardly any quantum...for example sending out a ruby dragon with only 4-6 random quanta? doesnt seem to fair...it makes it more balanced

[powdergame99]

well, true. but think if you draw a rustler! 

[Duplication]

well, true. but think if you draw a rustler! 

well i dont think the card would be used in such a deck

[Duplication]

would changing the effect to 0/1 until the end turn make the card more valuable? Since now the creature wont die? Or should it keep its attack with 0 hp?

[RRQJ]

I don't quite understand the point of this card.  You spend some random quanta to draw a card.  If it's not a creature, then you've basically wasted a lot of quanta.  If it is a creature, then it's automatically summoned, but is absolutely useless (no damage, dies at the end of the turn, can't use ability due to summon sickness).  What's the intended purpose of the creature summoned this way?

[maverixk]

Just a note, you might want to say 0|1 until the end of the turn because if it hs 0 health then it dies. Although spark and BL have zer health...

[Pineapple]

You should just delay the creature to keep it from attacking and using its skill, let it keep its HP. Problem solved.

[Kardo]

What if you allowed summoning of a creature card in your hand instead of having to draw one. The creature remains at 0/1 until the start (or end) of your next turn so it is vulnerable to the opponent's CC for 1-turn. That way this card could actually be used strategically, for example in a no-pillar deck using Novas to pay for high cost creatures. The downside of that would be that you no longer draw a card, making it slower to play (though if you're waiting for a good creature to Mindgate/Rewind, it'd actually speed it up).

If the creature were going to remain at 0 HP and die at the end of the turn, it would be a decent Death card that when used, causes the next creature played (by either player) to enter at 0/0 instead (and likely die at the end of the turn, unless buffed).